On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
quoted text > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:07:10PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
>> On (26/04/07 16:40), Siddha, Suresh B didst pronounce:
>>> oops. Appended patch should fix this. Can you please check this and Ack it?
>>
>> This patch does not apply cleanly to 2.6.21-rc7-mm2.
>
> Mel, Please backout the existing x86_64-set-node_possible_map-at-runtime.patch
> in rc7-mm2 and apply the appended patch instead.
>
I backed out
broken-out/x86_64-set-node_possible_map-at-runtime.patch
broken-out/x86_64-set-node_possible_map-at-runtime-fix.patch
broken-out/x86_64-set-node_possible_map-at-runtime-fix-2.patch
and dropped in your new patch. It passed boot tests on the machine in
question, so just from a testing perspective
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
quoted text > Andrew, as you already backedout x86_64-set-node_possible_map-at-runtime.patch
> from your -mm series, please include the appended patch (as try 2), after
> Mel confirms that it works fine on his setup.
>
> Thanks!
>
Thank you.
quoted text > ---
> From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> [patch] x86_64: set node_possible_map at runtime - try 2
>
> Set the node_possible_map at runtime on x86_64. On a non NUMA system,
> num_possible_nodes() will now say '1'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
> ---
>
> diff -pNru linux/arch/x86_64/mm/k8topology.c linux~/arch/x86_64/mm/k8topology.c
> --- linux/arch/x86_64/mm/k8topology.c 2007-04-27 10:37:19.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux~/arch/x86_64/mm/k8topology.c 2007-04-27 10:34:10.000000000 -0700
> @@ -49,11 +49,8 @@ int __init k8_scan_nodes(unsigned long s
> int found = 0;
> u32 reg;
> unsigned numnodes;
> - nodemask_t nodes_parsed;
> unsigned dualcore = 0;
>
> - nodes_clear(nodes_parsed);
> -
> if (!early_pci_allowed())
> return -1;
>
> @@ -102,7 +99,7 @@ int __init k8_scan_nodes(unsigned long s
> nodeid, (base>>8)&3, (limit>>8) & 3);
> return -1;
> }
> - if (node_isset(nodeid, nodes_parsed)) {
> + if (node_isset(nodeid, node_possible_map)) {
> printk(KERN_INFO "Node %d already present. Skipping\n",
> nodeid);
> continue;
> @@ -155,7 +152,7 @@ int __init k8_scan_nodes(unsigned long s
>
> prevbase = base;
>
> - node_set(nodeid, nodes_parsed);
> + node_set(nodeid, node_possible_map);
> }
>
> if (!found)
> diff -pNru linux/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c linux~/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c
> --- linux/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c 2007-04-27 10:37:19.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux~/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c 2007-04-27 10:34:10.000000000 -0700
> @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int __init setup_node_range(int n
> ret = -1;
> }
> nodes[nid].end = *addr;
> - node_set_online(nid);
> + node_set(nid, node_possible_map);
> printk(KERN_INFO "Faking node %d at %016Lx-%016Lx (%LuMB)\n", nid,
> nodes[nid].start, nodes[nid].end,
> (nodes[nid].end - nodes[nid].start) >> 20);
> @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ out:
> * SRAT.
> */
> remove_all_active_ranges();
> - for_each_online_node(i) {
> + for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map) {
> e820_register_active_regions(i, nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
> @@ -497,20 +497,25 @@ void __init numa_initmem_init(unsigned l
> {
> int i;
>
> + nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
> if (cmdline && !numa_emulation(start_pfn, end_pfn))
> return;
> + nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> if (!numa_off && !acpi_scan_nodes(start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT))
> return;
> + nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_K8_NUMA
> if (!numa_off && !k8_scan_nodes(start_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT, end_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT))
> return;
> + nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
> #endif
> printk(KERN_INFO "%s\n",
> numa_off ? "NUMA turned off" : "No NUMA configuration found");
> @@ -524,6 +529,7 @@ void __init numa_initmem_init(unsigned l
> memnodemap[0] = 0;
> nodes_clear(node_online_map);
> node_set_online(0);
> + node_set(0, node_possible_map);
> for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
> numa_set_node(i, 0);
> node_to_cpumask[0] = cpumask_of_cpu(0);
> diff -pNru linux/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c linux~/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c
> --- linux/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c 2007-04-27 10:37:19.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux~/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c 2007-04-27 10:34:10.000000000 -0700
> @@ -419,19 +419,21 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(unsigned long
> return -1;
> }
>
> + node_possible_map = nodes_parsed;
> +
> /* Finally register nodes */
> - for_each_node_mask(i, nodes_parsed)
> + for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map)
> setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
> /* Try again in case setup_node_bootmem missed one due
> to missing bootmem */
> - for_each_node_mask(i, nodes_parsed)
> + for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map)
> if (!node_online(i))
> setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
>
> for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
> if (cpu_to_node[i] == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> continue;
> - if (!node_isset(cpu_to_node[i], nodes_parsed))
> + if (!node_isset(cpu_to_node[i], node_possible_map))
> numa_set_node(i, NUMA_NO_NODE);
> }
> numa_init_array();
>
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/ Messages in current thread:
Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 -- x86_64 blade hard hangs , Mel Gorman , (Fri Apr 27, 7:59 pm)
