Neil Horman wrote:
quoted text
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:28:28AM +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
>> Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 04:05:11PM +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
> 
> Damn, This is what happens when I try to do things too quickly.  I missed one
> spot in my last patch where I replaced skb with rx_skb.  Its not critical, but
> it should improve sis900 performance by quite a bit.  This applies on top of the
> last two patches.  Sorry about that.
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> Neil
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> 
> 
>  sis900.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/net/sis900.c b/drivers/net/sis900.c
> index 7e44939..db59dce 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/sis900.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/sis900.c
> @@ -1790,7 +1790,7 @@ static int sis900_rx(struct net_device *net_dev)
>  			/* give the socket buffer to upper layers */
>  			rx_skb = sis_priv->rx_skbuff[entry];
>  			skb_put(rx_skb, rx_size);
> -			skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(rx_skb, net_dev);
> +			rx_skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(rx_skb, net_dev);
>  			netif_rx(rx_skb);
>  
>  			/* some network statistics */

My system also boots OK after I add this patch.  Can't tell whether it's 
improved the performance or not.

Peter
-- 
Peter Williams                                   pwil3058@bigpond.net.au

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
  -- Ambrose Bierce
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/