Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » April » 27

Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation
Date: Friday, April 27, 2007 - 7:15 pm

Ulrich Drepper wrote:

Well, dump/restore -- the traditional Unix backup solution -- went "the
back way" to restore the times in the filesystem.

The main use of atime seems to be to figure out when something can be
automatically deleted.  Anyone else have other usage scenarios?

	-hpa

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] utimensat implementation, Ulrich Drepper, (Thu Apr 26, 6:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 26, 7:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation, Ulrich Drepper, (Thu Apr 26, 8:54 pm)
Updated utimensat test program, Ulrich Drepper, (Fri Apr 27, 11:27 am)
Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Apr 26, 8:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation, Ulrich Drepper, (Thu Apr 26, 8:55 pm)
Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Apr 26, 8:58 pm)
Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation, Ulrich Drepper, (Thu Apr 26, 9:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Apr 27, 7:15 pm)
Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation, David Lang, (Fri Apr 27, 7:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation, Ulrich Drepper, (Fri Apr 27, 7:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Apr 27, 7:33 pm)