On Apr 25 2007 20:29, Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted text
>
>If the goal for 2.6.20 was to be a stable release (and it was), the goal
>for 2.6.21 is to have just survived the big timer-related changes and
>some of the other surprises [...] So it's been over two and a half
>months, and while it's certainly not the longest release cycle ever, it
>still dragged out a bit longer than I'd have hoped for and it should
>have.

I really appreciate the lot of -rcs, especially if there are so many 
intrusive changes/regressions. Like Andrew, I have a feeling that it 
gets buggier, but at least, it seems to be made up every ... two 
releases. 2.6.16 was a good one, .18, and .20. I suppose the 
bug/regression distribution between [2.6.16-2.6.17, 2.6.17-2.6.18] was 
biased like [70, 50]. About 2.6.21 - will see, rc has been to my liking.
Since a picture says more than a thousand words, have
http://jengelh.hopto.org/GFX0/kernel-rating-2.6.21.png
(The last kernel to have only 5 -rcs was 2.6.14 - interesting)


Happy hacking,
Jan
-- 
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/