Hi Nigel, On 4/26/07, Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net> wrote:As I am a total newbie to the power management code, I am unable to spot the conceptual difference in uswsusp suspend.c:suspend_system() and suspend2 kernel/power/suspend.c:suspend_main(). How are they different? On 4/26/07, Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net> wrote: I assume this doesn't affect the kernel at all with uswsusp? On 4/26/07, Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net> wrote: This is too broad. Please be more specific of the problems the current suspend and snapshot/shutdown code in the kernel has. Now to add to your list, as far as I can tell, suspend2 provides better feedback to the user via the netlink mechanism (although the kernel shouldn't be sending messages such as userui_redraw but instead let the userspace know of the actual events, for example, that tasks have now been frozen). However, I am unsure if this is still relevant as most of the work (snapshot writing) is being done in userspace where we explicitly know when processes have been frozen, when the snapshot is finished, and when it's written to disk. Pekka -
| Jon Smirl | 463 kernel developers missing! |
| Nigel Cunningham | Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
| Greg KH | Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scan... |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series.. |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
