On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:45:51AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:There's two cases where it's valid that kthread_stop is not called: a) the user is always builtin and the thread runs until the kernel halts. examples: voyager, arm ecard b) the thread is normally started/stopped, e.g. at module_init/module_exit but there is some reason why it could terminate earlier. examples: the various bluetooth threads, nfs-related threads that can be killed using signals c) we have some kind of asynchronous helper thread. examples: various s390 drivers, usbatm, therm_pm72 d) a driver has threadpools were we need to start/stop threads on demand. examples: nfsd, xpc case a) is trivial, we can just ignore the refcounting issue. case b) is what refcounting the task struct and proper handling in kthread_stop will deal with. case c) should get a new kthread_create_async api which starts a thread without blocking, so we can get rid of the workqueues in the s390 drivers. it should probably also be safe to be called from irq context. What makes this a bit complicated is the need to make sure no more thread is running in case the caller terminates (shutdown of the structure it's associated with or module removal) case d) should be deal with with a kthread_pool api -
| Alexandre Oliva | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Eric W. Biederman | Re: [net-2.6.24][patch 2/2] Dynamically allocate the loopback device |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Michael Riepe | Re: 2.6.27.19 + 28.7: network timeouts for r8169 and 8139too |
