Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> writes:Ok. Thinking about it I agree with Christoph that parallel API's can be a problem. However we do still need to support kernel threads where kthread_stop will never be called. There appear to be a few legitimate cases where someone wants to fire off a thread and have it do some work but don't care at all for stopping it before it is done. So I propose we add a kthread_orphan as a basic primitive to decrement the count on the task_struct if we want a kthread to simply exit after it has done some work. And as a helper function we can have a kthread_run_orphan. I think having a kthread_orphan will document what we are doing better and make it easy to find kernel threads that don't use kthread_stop. The pain is that this requires an audit of all kernel kthread creators so that we call kthread_orphan on the right ones, or else we will have a task_struct leak. At least that isn't a fatal condition. Eric -
| Parag Warudkar | BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0] |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 010/196] Chinese: add translation of Codingstyle |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 24/37] dccp: Processing Confirm options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| david | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
