Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252 driver

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@...>
Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@...>, <chas@...>, <ecd@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, April 23, 2007 - 4:17 am

On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 07:50:36PM -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:

And the binary semaphore terminology i a little confusing. struct
semaphore is a full counting semaphore that is only used as a binary
semaphore if we want to speak in CS terms.  Than everyone else just
caled them semaphore before these patches started to show up :)

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252 dri..., Matthias Kaehlcke, (Sun Apr 22, 5:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252..., Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Apr 23, 4:17 am)
Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252..., Matthias Kaehlcke, (Mon Apr 23, 4:35 am)
Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252..., Matthias Kaehlcke, (Mon Apr 23, 2:55 am)
Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252..., Matthias Kaehlcke, (Mon Apr 23, 3:40 am)
Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252..., Matthias Kaehlcke, (Mon Apr 23, 3:57 am)