Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252 driver

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@...>
Cc: <chas@...>, <ecd@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Sunday, April 22, 2007 - 7:50 pm

On Apr 22, 2007, at 17:39:59, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:

I think you really meant: "Use mutex instead of binary semaphore in  
idt77252 driver", since this is a binary semaphore (not a mutex,  
which are always binary):

and this is a mutex, not a spinlock:

Everything else looks good though

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252 dri..., Matthias Kaehlcke, (Sun Apr 22, 5:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252..., Kyle Moffett, (Sun Apr 22, 7:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252..., Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Apr 23, 4:17 am)
Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252..., Matthias Kaehlcke, (Mon Apr 23, 4:35 am)
Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252..., Matthias Kaehlcke, (Mon Apr 23, 2:55 am)
Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252..., Matthias Kaehlcke, (Mon Apr 23, 3:40 am)
Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252..., Matthias Kaehlcke, (Mon Apr 23, 3:57 am)