Re: Wrong free clusters count on FAT32

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...>
Cc: <7eggert@...>, Juergen Beisert <juergen127@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Date: Sunday, April 22, 2007 - 5:46 pm

On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:


That was back when I still used W98.


Yes. I think recalc_free is way more descriptive.


Non-experts in Linux FAT implementation details. "recalc sounds like might 
take long, let's try to disable it" should be all it takes to get a fast 
mount.
-- 
Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say:
35. Ummm... Didn't you say you turned it off?
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Wrong free clusters count on FAT32, Bodo Eggert, (Sun Apr 22, 9:28 am)
Re: Wrong free clusters count on FAT32, DervishD, (Sun Apr 22, 4:11 pm)
Re: Wrong free clusters count on FAT32, OGAWA Hirofumi, (Sun Apr 22, 10:04 am)
Re: Wrong free clusters count on FAT32, Bodo Eggert, (Sun Apr 22, 5:46 pm)
Re: Wrong free clusters count on FAT32, OGAWA Hirofumi, (Sun Apr 22, 10:20 pm)
Re: Wrong free clusters count on FAT32, OGAWA Hirofumi, (Sun Apr 22, 10:29 am)
Re: Wrong free clusters count on FAT32, Andreas Schwab, (Sun Apr 22, 10:53 am)
Re: Wrong free clusters count on FAT32, OGAWA Hirofumi, (Sun Apr 22, 11:13 am)