[PATCH -mm 0/3] Suspend notifiers

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>
Date: Sunday, April 22, 2007 - 2:10 pm

Hi,

The last two patches from this series are intended to address the problem that
some drivers allocate a lot of memory in their .suspend() routines causing
swsusp to fail (and generally may want to do some things that shouldn't be
done in .suspend()/.resume()).

The first one is a fix.

Greetings,
Rafael

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH -mm 0/3] Suspend notifiers, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 22, 2:10 pm)
[PATCH -mm 3/3] PM: Introduce suspend notifiers (rev. 2), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 22, 2:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] PM: Introduce suspend notifiers (rev. 2), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Apr 24, 7:26 am)
[PATCH -mm 2/3] swsusp: Free more memory, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 22, 2:14 pm)
[PATCH -mm 1/3] swsusp: Fix snapshot_release, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 22, 2:12 pm)