Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Monday, April 2, 2007 - 3:04 pm

Anthony Liguori wrote:

Well, obviously it keeps things simple for me to not worry about PCI
support in Xen at this point.  But I was thinking more of lguest; I
think PCI emulation would kill puppies.

    J
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Apr 2, 1:18 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Roland Dreier, (Mon Apr 2, 1:31 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Apr 2, 1:33 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Apr 2, 1:56 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Andi Kleen, (Mon Apr 2, 2:12 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeff Garzik, (Mon Apr 2, 2:33 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Andi Kleen, (Mon Apr 2, 2:36 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Apr 2, 2:42 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Roland Dreier, (Mon Apr 2, 2:49 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Anthony Liguori, (Mon Apr 2, 2:53 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Apr 2, 3:04 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Apr 2, 3:10 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeff Garzik, (Mon Apr 2, 3:25 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Apr 2, 3:30 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Christian Borntraeger, (Tue Apr 3, 1:29 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Andi Kleen, (Tue Apr 3, 1:30 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Cornelia Huck, (Tue Apr 3, 2:17 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Andi Kleen, (Tue Apr 3, 2:26 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 2:41 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Cornelia Huck, (Tue Apr 3, 3:41 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Cornelia Huck, (Tue Apr 3, 3:51 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 5:15 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Cornelia Huck, (Tue Apr 3, 6:39 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 7:03 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Apr 3, 8:00 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Cornelia Huck, (Tue Apr 3, 9:07 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 10:50 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Apr 3, 12:07 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 12:42 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Apr 3, 12:55 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Apr 3, 1:03 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 1:50 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Apr 3, 2:00 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Apr 3, 2:45 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 2:51 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Apr 3, 3:10 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 3:49 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Apr 3, 5:52 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Wed Apr 4, 6:11 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Apr 4, 8:50 am)