Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, <mathiasen@...>
Date: Monday, April 2, 2007 - 4:31 pm

> I would therefore like to propose that the Linux Foundation register a
 > PCI ID for use by LANANA ($3000/year), and we set up a LANANA registry
 > for these device IDs, together with a description of the device
 > interface each of them expect.  Similarly, a Subsystem ID registry can
 > be used (for virtualization vendors which don't have their own VID
 > already) to distinguish different implementations.

Sounds like a very good idea.

 > Obviously, anyone who adheres to the published interface can use one
 > of these VID:DIDs -- as far as I'm concerned, even hardware vendors;
 > we'll use the SID to distinguish between implementations.

I think for this to work, some attempt at a conformance testing
program is required...

 - R.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Apr 2, 4:18 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Apr 2, 4:56 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Andi Kleen, (Mon Apr 2, 5:12 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Christian Borntraeger, (Tue Apr 3, 4:29 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Andi Kleen, (Tue Apr 3, 4:30 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Cornelia Huck, (Tue Apr 3, 5:17 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 1:50 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Apr 3, 3:07 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 3:42 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Apr 3, 3:55 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 4:50 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Apr 3, 4:03 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Apr 3, 5:00 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 5:51 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Apr 3, 6:10 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 6:49 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Apr 3, 8:52 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Wed Apr 4, 9:11 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Apr 4, 11:50 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Apr 3, 5:45 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Andi Kleen, (Tue Apr 3, 5:26 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Apr 3, 11:00 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Cornelia Huck, (Tue Apr 3, 6:51 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeff Garzik, (Mon Apr 2, 5:33 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Andi Kleen, (Mon Apr 2, 5:36 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Apr 2, 5:42 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Apr 2, 6:10 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 5:41 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Cornelia Huck, (Tue Apr 3, 6:41 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 8:15 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Cornelia Huck, (Tue Apr 3, 9:39 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 10:03 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Cornelia Huck, (Tue Apr 3, 12:07 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeff Garzik, (Mon Apr 2, 6:25 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Apr 2, 6:30 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Anthony Liguori, (Mon Apr 2, 5:53 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Apr 2, 6:04 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Roland Dreier, (Mon Apr 2, 4:31 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Apr 2, 4:33 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Roland Dreier, (Mon Apr 2, 5:49 pm)