A set of "standard" virtual devices?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Monday, April 2, 2007 - 1:18 pm

On the subject of virtualization; there are a number of devices which 
keep being invented and reinvented by just about every virtualization 
vendor for no really good reason.

I personally recently pointed out that a proper virtualization solution 
should handle entropy collection at the lowest level (where the physical 
hardware drivers are) and present a hw_rng interface to the guests. 
Unfortunately, none of the hardware-based hw_rng interfaces is sane 
enough to do that with, which calls for a virtual driver.

It would be nice if there was one, and not a dozen, such drivers.

I would therefore like to propose that the Linux Foundation register a 
PCI ID for use by LANANA ($3000/year), and we set up a LANANA registry 
for these device IDs, together with a description of the device 
interface each of them expect.  Similarly, a Subsystem ID registry can 
be used (for virtualization vendors which don't have their own VID 
already) to distinguish different implementations.

Obviously, anyone who adheres to the published interface can use one of 
these VID:DIDs -- as far as I'm concerned, even hardware vendors; we'll 
use the SID to distinguish between implementations.

	-hpa
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Apr 2, 1:18 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Roland Dreier, (Mon Apr 2, 1:31 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Apr 2, 1:33 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Apr 2, 1:56 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Andi Kleen, (Mon Apr 2, 2:12 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeff Garzik, (Mon Apr 2, 2:33 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Andi Kleen, (Mon Apr 2, 2:36 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Apr 2, 2:42 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Roland Dreier, (Mon Apr 2, 2:49 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Anthony Liguori, (Mon Apr 2, 2:53 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Apr 2, 3:04 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Apr 2, 3:10 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeff Garzik, (Mon Apr 2, 3:25 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Apr 2, 3:30 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Christian Borntraeger, (Tue Apr 3, 1:29 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Andi Kleen, (Tue Apr 3, 1:30 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Cornelia Huck, (Tue Apr 3, 2:17 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Andi Kleen, (Tue Apr 3, 2:26 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 2:41 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Cornelia Huck, (Tue Apr 3, 3:41 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Cornelia Huck, (Tue Apr 3, 3:51 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 5:15 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Cornelia Huck, (Tue Apr 3, 6:39 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 7:03 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Apr 3, 8:00 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Cornelia Huck, (Tue Apr 3, 9:07 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 10:50 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Apr 3, 12:07 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 12:42 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Apr 3, 12:55 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Apr 3, 1:03 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 1:50 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Apr 3, 2:00 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Apr 3, 2:45 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 2:51 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Apr 3, 3:10 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue Apr 3, 3:49 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Apr 3, 5:52 pm)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, Arnd Bergmann, (Wed Apr 4, 6:11 am)
Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Apr 4, 8:50 am)