On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 09:31:37AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:=20 =20 =2E.. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Is it OK to do that? I recall when I was originally looking at the code I didn't want to just remove that line, because it looked like that was being used to first initialise the vc* structure when it is created, as well as reset it every time. Doesn't this leave vc->vc_utf uninitialised when a new VC is allocated? --=20 Paul "LeoNerd" Evans leonerd@leonerd.org.uk ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460 http://www.leonerd.org.uk/
| Avi Kivity | [PATCH 09/58] KVM: MMU: Respect nonpae pagetable quadrant when zapping ptes |
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 |
| James Morris | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
| Eric W. Biederman | Re: [PATCH] kexec: force x86_64 arches to boot kdump kernels on boot cpu |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT *] Solos PCI ADSL card update |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
