On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 09:31:37AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:=20 =20 =2E.. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Is it OK to do that? I recall when I was originally looking at the code I didn't want to just remove that line, because it looked like that was being used to first initialise the vc* structure when it is created, as well as reset it every time. Doesn't this leave vc->vc_utf uninitialised when a new VC is allocated? --=20 Paul "LeoNerd" Evans leonerd@leonerd.org.uk ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460 http://www.leonerd.org.uk/
| Linus Torvalds | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Artem Bityutskiy | [RFC PATCH 06/26] UBIFS: add superblock and master node |
| Joe Perches | [PATCH 001/148] include/asm-x86/acpi.h: checkpatch cleanups - formatting only |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
git: | |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Christoph Lameter | Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 |
