On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 09:31:37AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
quoted text
> Also see:
> 	http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/5/17/289
> 	http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/5/17/297
>=20
> These posts argue about terminfo being the culprit. But how can terminfo=
=20
quoted text
> be at fault, when `echo -en "\ec"` triggers it too?
>=20
> Since I am in a patch mood, here's my stance/patch, which is compile and=
=20
quoted text
> run tested and behaves as expected (both with `echo` and `reset`).

=2E..

quoted text
> Index: linux-2.6.21-rc5/drivers/char/vt.c
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
quoted text
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc5.orig/drivers/char/vt.c
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5/drivers/char/vt.c
> @@ -1518,7 +1518,6 @@ static void reset_terminal(struct vc_dat
>  	vc->vc_charset		=3D 0;
>  	vc->vc_need_wrap	=3D 0;
>  	vc->vc_report_mouse	=3D 0;
> -	vc->vc_utf		=3D 0;
>  	vc->vc_utf_count	=3D 0;
> =20
>  	vc->vc_disp_ctrl	=3D 0;
> #<EOF>

Is it OK to do that? I recall when I was originally looking at the code
I didn't want to just remove that line, because it looked like that was
being used to first initialise the vc* structure when it is created, as
well as reset it every time. Doesn't this leave vc->vc_utf uninitialised
when a new VC is allocated?

--=20
Paul "LeoNerd" Evans

leonerd@leonerd.org.uk
ICQ# 4135350       |  Registered Linux# 179460
http://www.leonerd.org.uk/