login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
April
»
19
Re: Performance degradation with FFSB between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc7
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...>
To: Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@...>
Cc: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Subject:
Re: Performance degradation with FFSB between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc7
Date: Thursday, April 19, 2007 - 5:03 am
On Wed, Apr 18 2007, Valerie Clement wrote:
quoted text
> > Running benchmark tests (FFSB) on an ext4 filesystem, I noticed a > performance degradation (about 15-20 percent) in sequential write tests > between 2.6.19-rc6 and 2.6.21-rc4 kernels. > > I ran the same tests on ext3 and XFS filesystems and I saw the same > performance difference between the two kernel versions for these two > filesystems. > > I have also reproduced it between 2.6.20.7 and 2.6.21-rc7. > The FFSB tests run 16 threads, each creating 1GB files. The tests were > done on the same x86_64 system, with the same kernel configuration and > on the same scsi device. Below are the throughput values given by FFSB. > > kernel XFS ext3 > ---------- > 2.6.20.7 48 MB/sec 44 MB/sec > > 2.6.21-rc7 38 MB/sec 37 MB/sec > > Did anyone else run across the problem? > Is there a known issue?
Please tell me how you are running ffsb, and also please include a dmessg from a booted system. -- Jens Axboe -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Performance degradation with FFSB between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-...
, Valerie Clement
, (Wed Apr 18, 9:54 am)
Re: Performance degradation with FFSB between 2.6.20 and 2.6...
, Jens Axboe
, (Thu Apr 19, 5:03 am)
Re: Performance degradation with FFSB between 2.6.20 and 2.6...
, Valerie Clement
, (Thu Apr 19, 5:31 am)
Re: Performance degradation with FFSB between 2.6.20 and 2.6...
, Jens Axboe
, (Thu Apr 19, 7:58 am)
Re: Performance degradation with FFSB between 2.6.20 and 2.6...
, Valerie Clement
, (Thu Apr 19, 8:45 am)
Re: Performance degradation with FFSB between 2.6.20 and 2.6...
, Jens Axboe
, (Thu Apr 19, 8:46 am)
Re: Performance degradation with FFSB between 2.6.20 and 2.6...
, Valerie Clement
, (Thu Apr 19, 9:22 am)
Re: Performance degradation with FFSB between 2.6.20 and 2.6...
, Jens Axboe
, (Thu Apr 19, 8:41 am)
Re: Performance degradation with FFSB between 2.6.20 and 2.6...
, Andrew Morton
, (Wed Apr 18, 4:57 pm)
Re: Performance degradation with FFSB between 2.6.20 and 2.6...
, Valerie Clement
, (Thu Apr 19, 5:11 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
Tarkan Erimer
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Amit K. Arora
[RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
Chuck Ebbert
Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Natalie Protasevich
[BUG] New Kernel Bugs
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
0 users
and
440 guests
online.
Syndicate