Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2

view
thread

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>

Cc: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...>, Mike Galbraith <efault@...>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>, Peter Williams <pwil3058@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, <caglar@...>, Willy Tarreau <w@...>, Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...>

Subject: Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2

Date: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 - 4:03 am

On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:

quoted text> ok - fortunately the delta between -v2-rc0 and -v2-final is pretty 
> small. One difference is the child-runs-first fix. To restore the 
> parent-runs-first logic, do this: 
> 
> 	echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_child_runs_first

Sorry, I did not follow the latest developments, but how many tunables we 
have so far in CFS? Are those for debug only or they're supposed to stay?
Weren't those listed inside the Axis of Evil (just to remain in topic :) 
till yesterday?

- Davide

-
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Apr 16, 6:07 pm)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Peter Williams, (Tue Apr 17, 2:46 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 17, 5:53 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, William Lee Irwin III, (Tue Apr 17, 3:51 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Peter Williams, (Tue Apr 17, 4:30 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Peter Williams, (Wed Apr 18, 3:15 pm)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 17, 4:16 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Peter Williams, (Tue Apr 17, 10:05 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 17, 4:52 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Gene Heskett, (Tue Apr 17, 12:53 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 17, 2:18 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Gene Heskett, (Tue Apr 17, 12:12 pm)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Davide Libenzi, (Tue Apr 17, 4:03 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 17, 4:20 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Nick Piggin, (Tue Apr 17, 4:18 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 17, 4:26 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Nick Piggin, (Tue Apr 17, 4:41 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 17, 4:57 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 17, 3:01 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Gene Heskett, (Tue Apr 17, 1:15 pm)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Gene Heskett, (Tue Apr 17, 1:22 pm)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Davide Libenzi, (Tue Apr 17, 3:31 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 17, 3:39 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Gene Heskett, (Tue Apr 17, 1:18 pm)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Willy Tarreau, (Tue Apr 17, 1:25 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Peter Williams, (Tue Apr 17, 8:06 pm)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 17, 2:27 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Mike Galbraith, (Tue Apr 17, 1:51 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Gene Heskett, (Tue Apr 17, 1:51 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Paolo Ornati, (Tue Apr 17, 3:18 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Peter Williams, (Tue Apr 17, 12:06 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 17, 2:49 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, S.Çağlar, (Mon Apr 16, 6:12 pm)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 17, 4:59 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, S.Çağlar, (Tue Apr 17, 10:45 am)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 17, 12:01 pm)

Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2, Gabriel C, (Tue Apr 17, 11:48 am)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
Ian Campbell	Re: [PATCH] x86: Construct 32 bit boot time page tables in native format.
Greg Kroah-Hartman	[PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO
Justin Piszcz	Linux Software RAID 5 Performance Optimizations: 2.6.19.1: (211MB/s read & 195...
Alan	Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
netbsd-tech-kern:
Matthias Scheler	Re: HEADS UP: timecounters (branch simonb-timecounters) merged into -current
David Laight	long usernames
Quentin Garnier	Re: Understanding foo_open, foo_read, etc.
Jared D. McNeill	Breaking binary compatibility for /dev/joy
git:

linux-netdev:
Jarek Poplawski	[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments
David Miller	[GIT]: Networking
Natalie Protasevich	[BUG] New Kernel Bugs

Colocation donated by:

Online users

strcmp

Syndicate