On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 05:40 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 04:29:01AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
 
quoted text
> > Yup, and progress _is_ happening now, quite rapidly.
> 
> Progress as in progress on Ingo's scheduler. I still don't know how we'd
> decide when to replace the mainline scheduler or with what.
> 
> I don't think we can say Ingo's is better than the alternatives, can we?

No, that would require massive performance testing of all alternatives.

quoted text
> If there is some kind of bakeoff, then I'd like one of Con's designs to
> be involved, and mine, and Peter's...

The trouble with a bakeoff is that it's pretty darn hard to get people
to test in the first place, and then comes weighting the subjective and
hard performance numbers.  If they're close in numbers, do you go with
the one which starts the least flamewars or what?

quoted text
> Maybe the progress is that more key people are becoming open to the idea
> of changing the scheduler.

Could be.  All was quiet for quite a while, but when RSDL showed up, it
aroused enough interest to show that scheduling woes is on folks radar.

	-Mike

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/