Re: fastcalls, was Re: [patch] generic rwsems

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Nick Piggin
Date: Friday, April 13, 2007 - 3:59 am

On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:19:30AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

I don't see why not. David objected me removing them I think because
the rwsem code called some from asm (but of course that's removed too).
However AFAIK, this situation should be using the asmlinkage attribute
anyway.

fastcall in kernel is annoying... it seems to imply that we normally
rather slow calls ;)
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch] generic rwsems, Nick Piggin, (Fri Apr 13, 3:04 am)
fastcalls, was Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Christoph Hellwig, (Fri Apr 13, 3:19 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Nick Piggin, (Fri Apr 13, 3:25 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Andi Kleen, (Fri Apr 13, 3:53 am)
Re: fastcalls, was Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Nick Piggin, (Fri Apr 13, 3:59 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Nick Piggin, (Fri Apr 13, 4:20 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems , David Howells, (Fri Apr 13, 4:44 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems , David Howells, (Fri Apr 13, 5:09 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Christoph Hellwig, (Fri Apr 13, 5:13 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Nick Piggin, (Fri Apr 13, 5:43 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems, William Lee Irwin III, (Fri Apr 13, 6:22 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems , David Howells, (Fri Apr 13, 6:31 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Nick Piggin, (Fri Apr 13, 7:03 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Eric Dumazet, (Fri Apr 13, 7:29 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems , David Howells, (Fri Apr 13, 7:49 am)