Re: [patch] generic rwsems

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Nick Piggin
Date: Friday, April 13, 2007 - 3:25 am

On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 12:04:16PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:

Oh, and it also converts powerpc and sparc64 to 64-bit counters, so
they can handle more than 32K tasks waiting (which was apparently a
real problem for SGI, and is probably a good thing).

But that reminds me:

I think I should put wait_lock after wait_list, so as to get a better
packing on most 64-bit architectures.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch] generic rwsems, Nick Piggin, (Fri Apr 13, 3:04 am)
fastcalls, was Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Christoph Hellwig, (Fri Apr 13, 3:19 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Nick Piggin, (Fri Apr 13, 3:25 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Andi Kleen, (Fri Apr 13, 3:53 am)
Re: fastcalls, was Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Nick Piggin, (Fri Apr 13, 3:59 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Nick Piggin, (Fri Apr 13, 4:20 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems , David Howells, (Fri Apr 13, 4:44 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems , David Howells, (Fri Apr 13, 5:09 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Christoph Hellwig, (Fri Apr 13, 5:13 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Nick Piggin, (Fri Apr 13, 5:43 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems, William Lee Irwin III, (Fri Apr 13, 6:22 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems , David Howells, (Fri Apr 13, 6:31 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Nick Piggin, (Fri Apr 13, 7:03 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems, Eric Dumazet, (Fri Apr 13, 7:29 am)
Re: [patch] generic rwsems , David Howells, (Fri Apr 13, 7:49 am)