Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted text > On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:42:29 +1000 Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
quoted text >>Maybe. How about LRU? Reclaim performance is bad, and you want to work out
>>which pages keep going off the end of it, or which pages keep getting
>>written out via it, or who's pages are on the active list, forcing mine
>>out.
>
>
> I guess we have static analysis versus dynamic. The interfaces which Matt
> is proposing are suited to answering the question "what is my memory being
> used for" (static). They're unlikely to be useful for answering the question
> "what's happening in the VM" (dynamic). Systemtap is probably better for the
> dynamic analysis.
"what is my memory being used for *now*" ;)
quoted text > I guess one could generate an answer to the static question with systemtap,
> by accumulating running counts across the application lifetime and then
> snapshotting them. Sounds hard though.
Can't you just traverse arbitrary kernel data structures at a given point
in time, exactly like the /proc/ call is doing?
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/13] maps: pagemap, kpagemap, and related cleanups , Nick Piggin , (Thu Apr 12, 7:18 pm)