On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 08:16:22PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > From: Dave Jones > Already posted at http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/7/7/255 I had to stop and think if this was an April 1st :) Back in 2005 it seemed I had a strong enough stomach to wade through smbfs for some unknown reason. These days like many others, I wish someone would just put the thing out of its misery. In Fedora we switched it off (in about 2005 iirc) in favor of using cifs, which for the most part is a drop-in replacement. There still remain 1-2 corner cases where it doesn't work iirc, but the situation is a lot better than it used to be. As to whether the patch is worthwhile/correct.. I really don't know. I posted it back then in the hopes that someone smbfs-savvy would pop up and review it. As you can see from the archive, no-one did. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 05/37] dccp: Cleanup routines for feature negotiation |
| Lennert Buytenhek | [PATCH 16/39] mv643xx_eth: get rid of ETH_/ethernet_/eth_ prefixes |
