Davide Libenzi wrote:
quoted text
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2007, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>   
>> What is the motivation for adding aio_resfd to an individual iocb instead of
>> the entire io context?  It seems redundant, as you can already create multiple
>> io contexts to wait on.
>>     
>
> To add it to the context, you need to either change the context create API 
> (I think no-go here), or add a new syscall just to handle that.
> Doing it in the iocb gives finer grained setup, but can be more work for 
> the user that wants to use it for all the iocbs.
>   

I think it's a bit too fine grained, and a new system call 
(io_bindfd()?) would be easier to use.  In addition, you would move the 
eventfd_fget() out of the submission path.

For the users that want fine grained control, they can already call 
io_setup() multiple times and submit iocbs to different completion rings.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/