Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Chris Wright
Date: Thursday, March 8, 2007 - 10:17 am

* Serge E. Hallyn (serue@us.ibm.com) wrote:

There's too much dup because stuff like above is just access control
not integrity measurement.  Need to break off the parts that really
are different.  But I don't have a great option offhand, I recognize
the complication.

thanks,
-chris
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks, Mimi Zohar, (Thu Mar 8, 9:03 am)
Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks, Chris Wright, (Thu Mar 8, 9:31 am)
Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks, Serge E. Hallyn, (Thu Mar 8, 10:00 am)
Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks, Chris Wright, (Thu Mar 8, 10:17 am)
Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks, Casey Schaufler, (Thu Mar 8, 11:30 am)
Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks, Chris Wright, (Thu Mar 8, 11:42 am)
Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks, Serge E. Hallyn, (Thu Mar 8, 11:46 am)
Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Thu Mar 8, 1:38 pm)
Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks, Serge E. Hallyn, (Thu Mar 8, 1:54 pm)
Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks, Mimi Zohar, (Thu Mar 8, 2:57 pm)