Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ...

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2007 - 11:06 am

On Wednesday 07 March 2007 18:45, Linus Torvalds wrote:

Yes, but mntget()/mntput() are protected against NULL.
I was quite happy to remove two locked operations :)
I didnt found a way to crash (yet) my patched machine :)


I tried this path today and failed...
Too many changes to do (nameidata) to propagate a 'struct file *' 
appropriately...


OK no problem here is the patch without messing f_path.mnt 

(benchmark results not really different on my little machine, SMP kernel but 
one CPU only... maybe because lock suffix is changed by a nop)


[PATCH] Delay the dentry name generation on sockets and pipes.

1) Introduces a new method in 'struct dentry_operations'. This method called 
d_dname() might be called from d_path() to be able to provide a dentry name 
for special filesystems. It is called without locks.

Future patches (if we succeed in having one common dentry for all pipes) may 
need to change prototype of this method, but we now use :
char *d_dname(struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, int buflen)


2) Use this new method for sockets : No more sprintf() at socket creation. 
This is delayed up to the moment someone does an access to /proc/pid/fd/...

3) Use this new method for pipes : No more sprintf() at pipe creation. This is 
delayed up to the moment someone does an access to /proc/pid/fd/...

A benchmark consisting of 1.000.000 calls to pipe()/close()/close() gives a 
*nice* speedup on my Pentium(M) 1.6 Ghz :

3.090 s instead of 3.450 s

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
 fs/dcache.c            |    3 +++
 fs/pipe.c              |   12 +++++++++---
 include/linux/dcache.h |    1 +
 net/socket.c           |   13 ++++++++++---
 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Davide Libenzi, (Tue Mar 6, 5:37 pm)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue Mar 6, 5:51 pm)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Davide Libenzi, (Tue Mar 6, 6:01 pm)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue Mar 6, 6:27 pm)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Davide Libenzi, (Tue Mar 6, 6:47 pm)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Eric Dumazet, (Tue Mar 6, 11:52 pm)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Davide Libenzi, (Wed Mar 7, 12:15 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Eric Dumazet, (Wed Mar 7, 12:16 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Mar 7, 1:56 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed Mar 7, 10:02 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed Mar 7, 10:21 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Eric Dumazet, (Wed Mar 7, 10:31 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Eric Dumazet, (Wed Mar 7, 10:36 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed Mar 7, 10:45 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Eric Dumazet, (Wed Mar 7, 11:06 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed Mar 7, 11:30 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Eric Dumazet, (Wed Mar 7, 11:52 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed Mar 7, 12:07 pm)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Anton Blanchard, (Wed Mar 7, 3:14 pm)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed Mar 7, 3:57 pm)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Michael K. Edwards, (Wed Mar 7, 6:25 pm)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Kyle Moffett, (Wed Mar 7, 7:48 pm)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed Mar 7, 8:20 pm)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Eric Dumazet, (Thu Mar 8, 12:24 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Michael K. Edwards, (Thu Mar 8, 1:37 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Thu Mar 8, 1:56 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Eric Dumazet, (Thu Mar 8, 2:42 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Thu Mar 8, 3:21 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Eric Dumazet, (Thu Mar 8, 4:11 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Thu Mar 8, 4:18 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu Mar 8, 8:52 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Valdis.Kletnieks, (Thu Mar 8, 9:57 am)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Bob Copeland, (Thu Mar 8, 1:00 pm)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Kyle Moffett, (Thu Mar 8, 6:34 pm)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Anton Blanchard, (Thu Mar 8, 7:46 pm)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Anton Blanchard, (Thu Mar 8, 7:51 pm)
Re: [patch] epoll use a single inode ..., Anton Blanchard, (Thu Mar 8, 7:52 pm)