On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 02:53:07PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
quoted text
> > > msync() might never get called and then we're back with the old
> > > behaviour where we can surprise the VM with a ton of dirty pages.
> > 
> > But we're root. With your patch, root *can't* do nonlinear writeback
> > well. Ever. With msync, at least you give them enough rope.
> 
> Restricting to root doesn't buy you much, nobody wants to be root.
> Restricting to mlock is similarly pointless.  UML _will_ want to get
> swapped out if there's no activity.

They could always not use nonlinear, or we could add a ulimit to the
size of nonlinear vaddr allowed. 

quoted text
> Restricting to tmpfs makes sense, but it's probably not what UML
> wants.

I think it is OK. They might want some persistent storage to migrate
or something, but that can always be done by copying from tmpfs to
a block based filesystem.
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/