On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:44:24PM +0530, Shailendra Tripathi wrote:
I ran xfsqa over it, which should catch this case.
I should have made my wording more clear, we always do PAGE_SIZE +
buffer allocations. After XFS_BUF_SETP_PTR the actually used buffer
might be smaller. I tested XFS_BUF_SETP_PTR manually with
artifical test code aswell, and made sure it still works.
Long term I have a plan to replace XFS_BUF_SETP_PTR with better
schemes, but that's irrelevant for this patch.
-