Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Monday, March 5, 2007 - 3:05 am

* Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com> wrote:


it's just the simple hack below.

	Ingo

------------------------>
Subject: [patch] suspend debugging: simulate suspend-to-RAM
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

most resume bugs are due to the kernel hanging or crashing while trying 
to resume a specific device. It is extremely hard to debug such hangs 
because often when the hang happens there's no console available yet.

Make debugging such bugs easier by offering a resume mode that does not 
actually call into the BIOS to turn off the machine. This, in 
combination with earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,115200,keep , 
CONFIG_PM_DEBUG=y, CONFIG_DISABLE_CONSOLE_SUSPEND=y and 
/sys/power/filter enables me to have a fully functional serial console 
during the full suspend/resume cycle.

I debugged two suspend bugs in the -rt kernel this way already, so it's 
pretty useful.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |    4 ++++
 drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c           |   15 ++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/acpi.h                |    1 +
 kernel/sysctl.c                     |    8 ++++++++
 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ linux/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -163,6 +163,10 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. 
 
 	acpi_osi=	[HW,ACPI] empty param disables _OSI
 
+	acpi_simulate_suspend_to_ram
+			[KNL] Do not call into BIOS to do suspend-to-RAM
+			Format: <0/1>
+
 	acpi_serialize	[HW,ACPI] force serialization of AML methods
 
 	acpi_skip_timer_override [HW,ACPI]
Index: linux/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
+++ linux/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
@@ -35,6 +35,14 @@ static u32 acpi_suspend_states[] = {
 
 static int init_8259A_after_S1;
 
+/*
+ * simulate entry into the BIOS - this way the system will not
+ * be turned off for real, and the kernel's resume functionality
+ * can be debugged while still having some system capabilities
+ * left. This is especially useful in combination with /sys/power/filter.
+ */
+int acpi_simulate_suspend_to_ram;
+
 /**
  *	acpi_pm_prepare - Do preliminary suspend work.
  *	@pm_state:		suspend state we're entering.
@@ -91,7 +99,12 @@ static int acpi_pm_enter(suspend_state_t
 		break;
 
 	case PM_SUSPEND_MEM:
-		do_suspend_lowlevel();
+		if (unlikely(acpi_simulate_suspend_to_ram)) {
+			printk(KERN_INFO "ACPI: simulating suspend-to-RAM: "
+					 "not calling BIOS.\n");
+		} else {
+			do_suspend_lowlevel();
+		}
 		break;
 
 	case PM_SUSPEND_DISK:
Index: linux/include/linux/acpi.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ linux/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ extern int pci_mmcfg_config_num;
 
 extern int sbf_port;
 extern unsigned long acpi_video_flags;
+extern int acpi_simulate_suspend_to_ram;
 
 #else	/* !CONFIG_ACPI */
 
Index: linux/kernel/sysctl.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ linux/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -581,6 +581,14 @@ static ctl_table kern_table[] = {
 		.mode		= 0644,
 		.proc_handler	= &proc_doulongvec_minmax,
 	},
+	{
+		.ctl_name	= CTL_UNNUMBERED,
+		.procname	= "acpi_simulate_suspend_to_ram",
+		.data		= &acpi_simulate_suspend_to_ram,
+		.maxlen		= sizeof (int),
+		.mode		= 0644,
+		.proc_handler	= &proc_dointvec,
+	},
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_IA64
 	{
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Feb 20, 9:53 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Faik Uygur, (Wed Feb 21, 6:26 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 21, 6:32 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Kok, Auke, (Wed Feb 21, 8:58 am)
request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-1 (is Re: Lin ..., YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / , (Wed Feb 21, 9:23 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Daniel Walker, (Wed Feb 21, 9:24 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 21, 10:07 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Daniel Walker, (Wed Feb 21, 10:19 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Daniel Walker, (Wed Feb 21, 10:38 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 21, 10:41 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 21, 11:18 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Daniel Walker, (Wed Feb 21, 11:23 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Andreas Schwab, (Wed Feb 21, 11:34 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Dave Jones, (Wed Feb 21, 11:40 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Jiri Slaby, (Wed Feb 21, 11:41 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Jiri Slaby, (Wed Feb 21, 11:51 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Feb 21, 12:19 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 21, 12:23 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Feb 21, 12:24 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Daniel Walker, (Wed Feb 21, 12:24 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Andrew Morton, (Wed Feb 21, 12:45 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Daniel Walker, (Wed Feb 21, 1:00 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Feb 21, 1:18 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 21, 1:43 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Daniel Walker, (Wed Feb 21, 1:49 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Feb 21, 2:06 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 21, 2:21 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Daniel Walker, (Wed Feb 21, 2:23 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1 [git bisect], Pete Harlan, (Wed Feb 21, 3:05 pm)
NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Luca Tettamanti, (Wed Feb 21, 4:04 pm)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 21, 4:17 pm)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Luca Tettamanti, (Wed Feb 21, 4:19 pm)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Jan Engelhardt, (Thu Feb 22, 5:36 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Feb 22, 6:25 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Pierre Ossman, (Thu Feb 22, 7:10 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Feb 22, 7:20 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Pierre Ossman, (Thu Feb 22, 7:51 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Pierre Ossman, (Thu Feb 22, 8:13 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Feb 22, 8:51 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Feb 22, 9:00 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Pierre Ossman, (Thu Feb 22, 9:27 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Feb 22, 9:42 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck, David Miller, (Thu Feb 22, 10:26 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck, Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Feb 22, 10:39 am)
RE: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Thu Feb 22, 12:58 pm)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Pierre Ossman, (Thu Feb 22, 2:07 pm)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Andreas Mohr, (Thu Feb 22, 2:25 pm)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Feb 22, 3:21 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1 -- suspend, Pavel Machek, (Thu Feb 22, 10:25 pm)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Pierre Ossman, (Thu Feb 22, 11:55 pm)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck, David Miller, (Fri Feb 23, 2:25 am)
Re: sparc generic time / clockevents, David Miller, (Fri Feb 23, 2:55 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Andrew Morton, (Fri Feb 23, 3:08 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Feb 23, 4:35 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Feb 23, 4:39 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Feb 23, 4:47 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck, Andi Kleen, (Fri Feb 23, 8:50 am)
Re: sparc generic time / clockevents, john stultz, (Fri Feb 23, 12:51 pm)
Re: sparc generic time / clockevents, Peter Keilty, (Fri Feb 23, 3:15 pm)
Re: sparc generic time / clockevents, David Miller, (Fri Feb 23, 5:34 pm)
Re: sparc generic time / clockevents, john stultz, (Fri Feb 23, 5:53 pm)
Re: sparc generic time / clockevents, David Miller, (Fri Feb 23, 10:52 pm)
2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 1), Adrian Bunk, (Sun Feb 25, 10:52 am)
2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Adrian Bunk, (Sun Feb 25, 10:55 am)
2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 3), Adrian Bunk, (Sun Feb 25, 11:02 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 3), Greg KH, (Sun Feb 25, 1:59 pm)
2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Adrian Bunk, (Mon Feb 26, 3:01 pm)
2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Adrian Bunk, (Mon Feb 26, 3:05 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Feb 27, 1:21 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Tue Feb 27, 1:33 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Michal Piotrowski, (Tue Feb 27, 1:33 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Michal Piotrowski, (Tue Feb 27, 1:35 am)
regression: forcedeth.c hang, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Feb 27, 1:39 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Mike Galbraith, (Tue Feb 27, 1:54 am)
Re: regression: forcedeth.c hang, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Feb 27, 2:01 am)
Re: regression: forcedeth.c hang, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Feb 27, 2:38 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Jens Axboe, (Tue Feb 27, 3:02 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Pavel Machek, (Tue Feb 27, 3:21 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Jens Axboe, (Tue Feb 27, 3:30 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Tue Feb 27, 3:34 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Jens Axboe, (Tue Feb 27, 3:59 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Jens Axboe, (Tue Feb 27, 4:15 am)
Re: regression: forcedeth.c hang, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Feb 27, 4:25 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Meelis Roos, (Tue Feb 27, 6:00 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Jens Axboe, (Tue Feb 27, 6:09 am)
Re: regression: forcedeth.c hang, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Feb 27, 8:42 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Adrian Bunk, (Tue Feb 27, 3:09 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Con Kolivas, (Tue Feb 27, 4:07 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Mike Galbraith, (Tue Feb 27, 9:21 pm)
Re: regression: forcedeth.c hang, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Feb 28, 12:36 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Jens Axboe, (Wed Feb 28, 12:41 am)
RE: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 1), Karasyov, Konstantin A, (Wed Feb 28, 11:16 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Michael S. Tsirkin, (Wed Feb 28, 2:13 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 28, 2:27 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Michael S. Tsirkin, (Wed Feb 28, 2:40 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Con Kolivas, (Wed Feb 28, 3:01 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Mike Galbraith, (Wed Feb 28, 5:02 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Jeff Chua, (Wed Feb 28, 8:45 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 1, 1:46 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 1, 2:34 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 1, 3:41 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Con Kolivas, (Thu Mar 1, 4:13 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Mar 1, 4:33 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Con Kolivas, (Thu Mar 1, 5:05 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Mar 1, 5:20 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 1, 6:30 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 1, 7:52 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Mar 1, 9:12 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Con Kolivas, (Thu Mar 1, 2:51 pm)
[PATCH] sched: remove SMT nice, Con Kolivas, (Thu Mar 1, 3:33 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Linus Torvalds, (Thu Mar 1, 4:36 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Linus Torvalds, (Thu Mar 1, 5:26 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Linus Torvalds, (Thu Mar 1, 5:41 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Fri Mar 2, 12:14 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Fri Mar 2, 12:21 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Fri Mar 2, 1:04 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Pavel Machek, (Fri Mar 2, 3:07 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Fri Mar 2, 3:20 am)
[patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Mar 2, 3:22 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Fri Mar 2, 4:39 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Avi Kivity, (Sat Mar 3, 1:21 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Avi Kivity, (Sat Mar 3, 1:22 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Andrew Morton, (Sat Mar 3, 4:57 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Junio C Hamano, (Sat Mar 3, 5:07 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Adrian Bunk, (Sun Mar 4, 5:04 pm)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 1:22 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 5, 1:42 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 1:44 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Avi Kivity, (Mon Mar 5, 1:50 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 1:57 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Avi Kivity, (Mon Mar 5, 2:27 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 3:05 am)
SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 3:11 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 5, 3:23 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 3:29 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Avi Kivity, (Mon Mar 5, 3:33 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 3:33 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 5, 3:40 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 5:50 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 5, 5:54 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 5, 6:26 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 6:32 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 5, 8:34 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 5, 8:44 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 5, 9:14 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 9:41 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Jens Axboe, (Mon Mar 5, 11:16 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Jeff Chua, (Mon Mar 5, 6:32 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Jeff Garzik, (Mon Mar 5, 10:30 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Kok, Auke, (Mon Mar 5, 11:35 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Mar 6, 2:04 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Mar 6, 2:06 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Jeff Chua, (Tue Mar 6, 5:03 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Michael S. Tsirkin, (Tue Mar 6, 5:08 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Jeff Chua, (Tue Mar 6, 5:12 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Kok, Auke, (Tue Mar 6, 8:34 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Mar 6, 9:26 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Mar 6, 9:52 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Kok, Auke, (Tue Mar 6, 10:09 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Tue Mar 6, 9:15 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Kok, Auke, (Wed Mar 7, 9:31 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Kok, Auke, (Wed Mar 7, 9:45 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Wed Mar 7, 12:28 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Andrew Morton, (Wed Mar 7, 7:53 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Wed Mar 7, 11:58 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Jeff Garzik, (Thu Mar 8, 2:55 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Thu Mar 8, 3:23 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Mar 8, 10:27 am)
[PATCH 0/2] Repair pci_restore_state when used with device ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Mar 8, 12:58 pm)
[PATCH 1/2] msi: Safer state caching., Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Mar 8, 1:04 pm)
Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Pavel Machek, (Thu Mar 8, 11:44 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Kok, Auke, (Fri Mar 9, 4:06 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Fri Mar 9, 8:41 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Sun Mar 11, 4:11 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Sun Mar 11, 4:24 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Sun Mar 11, 10:37 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Sun Mar 11, 11:03 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Sun Mar 11, 11:27 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Sun Mar 11, 11:37 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Sun Mar 11, 12:50 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Sun Mar 11, 9:35 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Pavel Machek, (Mon Mar 19, 8:32 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Mar 19, 2:23 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Apr 16, 12:56 pm)