[-mm patch] fix the ROMFS_* dependencies

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Sunday, March 4, 2007 - 6:49 pm

On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 03:35:14PM +0000, David Howells wrote:

OK, what about the patch below?


cu
Adrian


<--  snip  -->


This patch:
- adds the missing dependency of ROMFS_FS on BLOCK || MTD
- disallows the illegal ROMFS_FS=y, MTD=m, ROMFS_ON_MTD=y
- ensures that at least one of ROMFS_ON_BLOCK and ROMFS_ON_MTD is always 
  enabled:
  - automatically enable ROMFS_ON_MTD if BLOCK=n
  - automatically enable ROMFS_ON_BLOCK if ROMFS_ON_MTD=n
- if EMBEDDED=n, ROMFS_ON_BLOCK is always enabled
  - the "(which may have been disabled)" that could now confuse
    users has therefore been removed from the help text

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>

---

 fs/Kconfig |   17 ++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm1/fs/Kconfig.old	2007-03-04 23:04:41.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm1/fs/Kconfig	2007-03-04 23:24:27.000000000 +0100
@@ -484,6 +484,7 @@
 
 config ROMFS_FS
 	tristate "ROM file system support"
+	depends on BLOCK || MTD
 	---help---
 	  This is a very small read-only file system mainly intended for
 	  initial ram disks of installation disks, but it could be used for
@@ -499,8 +500,9 @@
 	  answer N.
 
 config ROMFS_ON_BLOCK
-	bool "Block device-backed ROM file system support"
+	bool "Block device-backed ROM file system support" if (ROMFS_ON_MTD && EMBEDDED)
 	depends on ROMFS_FS && BLOCK
+	default y
 	help
 	  This permits ROMFS to use block devices buffered through the page
 	  cache as the medium from which to retrieve data.  It does not allow
@@ -509,14 +511,15 @@
 	  If unsure, answer Y.
 
 config ROMFS_ON_MTD
-	bool "MTD-backed ROM file system support"
-	depends on ROMFS_FS && MTD
+	bool "MTD-backed ROM file system support" if BLOCK
+	depends on ROMFS_FS
+	depends on MTD=y || (ROMFS_FS=m && MTD)
+	default y
 	help
 	  This permits ROMFS to use MTD based devices directly, without the
-	  intercession of the block layer (which may have been disabled).  It
-	  also allows direct mapping of MTD devices through romfs files under
-	  NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly addressable by
-	  the CPU.
+	  intercession of the block layer.  It also allows direct mapping of
+	  MTD devices through romfs files under NOMMU conditions if the
+	  underlying device is directly addressable by the CPU.
 
 	  If unsure, answer Y.
 

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Fri Mar 2, 4:00 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Fri Mar 2, 4:04 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Russell King, (Fri Mar 2, 4:04 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Fri Mar 2, 4:08 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Russell King, (Fri Mar 2, 4:10 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Fri Mar 2, 4:15 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Bryan Wu, (Fri Mar 2, 7:24 am)
[-mm patch] cpu_idle: fix build break , Frederik Deweerdt, (Fri Mar 2, 7:40 am)
Re: [-mm patch] cpu_idle: fix build break, Venkatesh Pallipadi, (Fri Mar 2, 8:24 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Michal Piotrowski, (Fri Mar 2, 8:56 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1 - fb_ddc_read() not defined, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Fri Mar 2, 9:03 am)
Re: [-mm patch] cpu_idle: fix build break, Frederik Deweerdt, (Fri Mar 2, 9:24 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1 - fb_ddc_read() not defined, James Simmons, (Fri Mar 2, 9:31 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Badari Pulavarty, (Fri Mar 2, 9:32 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1 - fb_ddc_read() not defined, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Fri Mar 2, 9:51 am)
[patch -mm] x86_64: fake numa cmdline flag fix, David Rientjes, (Fri Mar 2, 10:03 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Fri Mar 2, 10:10 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Badari Pulavarty, (Fri Mar 2, 10:15 am)
Re: [patch -mm] x86_64: fake numa cmdline flag fix, Badari Pulavarty, (Fri Mar 2, 10:21 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Randy Dunlap, (Fri Mar 2, 10:30 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1: pata_via: wrong cable detection, Laurent Riffard, (Fri Mar 2, 3:52 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Michal Piotrowski, (Fri Mar 2, 4:42 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Fri Mar 2, 5:40 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Michal Piotrowski, (Fri Mar 2, 6:22 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Fri Mar 2, 6:41 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1 - build error with CONFIG_NO_HZ=y and C ..., Antonino A. Daplas, (Sat Mar 3, 12:45 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Michal Piotrowski, (Sat Mar 3, 3:08 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Sat Mar 3, 5:06 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Russell King, (Sat Mar 3, 11:03 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Mariusz Kozlowski, (Sun Mar 4, 2:07 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Mariusz Kozlowski, (Sun Mar 4, 2:48 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Sun Mar 4, 4:34 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Mariusz Kozlowski, (Sun Mar 4, 5:01 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Mariusz Kozlowski, (Sun Mar 4, 10:06 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Michal Piotrowski, (Sun Mar 4, 10:13 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Michal Piotrowski, (Sun Mar 4, 10:20 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, J.A. , (Sun Mar 4, 5:11 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Sun Mar 4, 5:29 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Sun Mar 4, 6:17 pm)
[-mm patch] saa7134: fix MODULES=n compilation, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Mar 4, 6:47 pm)
2.6.21-rc2-mm1: drivers/net/wireless/ compile error, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Mar 4, 6:47 pm)
[-mm patch] drivers/cpuidle/: make code static, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Mar 4, 6:47 pm)
[-mm patch] make fb_deferred_io_mkwrite() static, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Mar 4, 6:49 pm)
[-mm patch] fix the ROMFS_* dependencies, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Mar 4, 6:49 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Mon Mar 5, 3:14 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Antonino A. Daplas, (Mon Mar 5, 3:30 am)
arm utrace, Roland McGrath, (Mon Mar 5, 3:41 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1: drivers/net/wireless/ compile error, Michael Buesch, (Mon Mar 5, 3:41 am)
Re: [-mm patch] fix the ROMFS_* dependencies , David Howells, (Mon Mar 5, 6:36 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Zan Lynx, (Mon Mar 5, 9:34 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, J.A. , (Mon Mar 5, 3:20 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Mon Mar 5, 4:11 pm)
i2c vs nVidia [Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1], J.A. , (Mon Mar 5, 5:16 pm)
Re: i2c vs nVidia [Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1], Andrew Morton, (Mon Mar 5, 5:33 pm)
Re: i2c vs nVidia [Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1], Greg KH, (Mon Mar 5, 5:44 pm)
[PATCH] sched: fix idle at tick, Con Kolivas, (Mon Mar 5, 11:25 pm)
Re: i2c vs nVidia [Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1], Jean Delvare, (Tue Mar 6, 1:45 am)
Re: i2c vs nVidia [Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1], Jean Delvare, (Tue Mar 6, 3:56 am)
Re: [-mm patch] fix the ROMFS_* dependencies, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Mar 6, 4:43 pm)