Re: [patch 10/13] signal/timer/event fds v8 - eventfd core ...

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Friday, March 30, 2007 - 12:40 pm

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:37:14 -0700
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:


Again, can we borrow wqh.lock?

`count' needs documentation - these things are key to understanding the
code.


dittos


dittos


dittos


"that do not allow sleeping"


typo


So it is the caller's responsibility to ensure that *file refers to an
eventfd file?


Neither the incoming arg (usefully named "n") nor the return value are
documented.



Documentation?


Needs interface documentation, please.  Even the changelog doesn't tell us
what an EAGAIN return from read() means.


Some architectures do not implement 64-bit get_user()


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 10/13] signal/timer/event fds v8 - eventfd core ..., Davide Libenzi, (Tue Mar 20, 11:37 am)
Re: [patch 10/13] signal/timer/event fds v8 - eventfd core ..., Andrew Morton, (Fri Mar 30, 12:40 pm)