Adrian Bunk wrote:
quoted text > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 07:55:38PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>> Andi Kleen wrote:
>>
>>> init functions should only ever be called from other init functions.
>>>
>>> So this should not happen. If it happens the annotations need to be fixed.
>>>
>> I've seen some versions of gcc inline weak functions too.
>>
>
> Please be more precise:
> - gcc version
> - example code
> - bug number in the gcc Bugzilla
>
Sorry, it was a while ago, and I didn't take the time to fully report
it. It was FC6 on x86_64, doing a 32-bit cross-build. I'll see if I
can repro it.
quoted text > This would also help understanding what you are talking about:
> - Did gcc inline a global function?
> - Or was a static function declared as weak (which might be an error
> by the programmer)?
> - ...
>
It was, specifically, smp_setup_processor_id getting inlined into
start_kernel.
J
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: smart gcc inliner... , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , (Fri Mar 30, 12:39 pm)