Stephane Eranian wrote on Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 07:39:37AM -0800:
That is still problematic as finding out the FSB might not be
trivial. For example, for the NForce4 chipsets we have a too to
manipulate FSB and multipliers, but it's not in the kernel and never
will be. I don't think that K8 has a way to find the FSB from the CPU
only, so you are bound to tangle with "nice" chipsets from NVidia et al.
I like the idea, but I expect there will be reservations against
presenting a /proc file that cannot be supported for almost all
machines.
In general, I would like the cpufreq code split up, as I need to reuse
parts of it for other clock manipulation projects. Currently, cpufreq
is a blob of code to manipulate frequencies, and to deal with the
fallout. These two should be split up.
Martin
--
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/
-