On 3/30/07, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
quoted text > Aubrey Li <aubreylee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Keep the same behave as MMU but with bad performance, or keep the same
> > performance as MMU but without the same behave, Which one is more
> > important?
>
> The thing to do is to pass a flag to mmap() to suppress the memset (as
> suggested). This can then be used by the uClibc malloc() implementation and
> does not impact any application that does an anon mmap() expecting the memory
> returned to be zeroed.
>
As Mike mentioned, it implies breakage in POSIX behavior
and is specific to no-mmu only.
What kind of application does an anonymous mmap() expecting the memory
returned to be zeroed?
-Aubrey
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] nommu arch dont zero the anonymous mapping by ... , Aubrey Li , (Fri Mar 30, 8:46 am)