login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2)

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Cc: Thomas Meyer <thomas@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-pci@...>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Len Brown <lenb@...>
Date: Sunday, March 25, 2007 - 4:37 pm

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:


The problem with the current init_low_mappings is that it hacks the
current page table.  If we can instead use a different page table
the code becomes SMP safe.

I have extracted the patch that addresses this from the relocatable
patchset and appended it for sparking ideas.  It goes a little
farther than we need to solve this issue but the basics are there.


Reasonable.



So I'm not certain if in a multiple cpu context we can avoid all of the
issues with cpu hotplug but there is a reasonable chance so I will
explain as best I can.

Yanking the appropriate code out of linuxbios the way a processor should stop
itself is to send an INIT IPI to itself.  This puts a cpu into an optimized
wait for startup IPI state where it is otherwise disabled.  This is the state
any sane BIOS will put the cpus into before control is handed off to the kernel.


I'm not certain what to do with the interrupt races.  But I will see
if I can explain what I know.

<braindump>

- Most ioapics are buggy.
- Most ioapics do not follow pci-ordering rules with respect to
  interrupt message deliver so ensuring all in-flight irqs have
  arrived somewhere is very hard.
- To avoid bugs we always limit ourselves to reprogramming the ioapics
  in the interrupt handler, and not considering an interrupt
  successfully reprogrammed until we have received an irq in the new
  location.
- On x86 we have two basic interrupt handling modes.
  o logical addressing with lowest priority delivery.
  o physical addressing with delivery to a single cpu.
- With logical addressing as long as the cpu is not available for
  having an interrupt delivered to it the interrupt will be
  never be delivered to a particular cpu.  Ideally we also update
  the mask in the ioapic to not target that cpu.
- With physical addressing targeting a single cpu we need to reprogram
  the ioapics not to target that specific cpu.  This needs to happen
  in the interrupt handler and we need to wait for the next interrupt
  before we tear down our data structures for handling the interrupt.

  The current cpu hotplug code attempts to reprogram the ioapics from
  process context which is just wrong.

Now as part of suspend/resume I think we should be programming the
hardware not to generate interrupts in the first place at the actual
hardware devices so we can likely avoid all of the code that
reprograms interrupts while they are active.  If we can use things
like pci ordering rules to ensure the device will never fire the
interrupt until resumed we should be able to disable interrupts
synchronously.  Something that we can not safely do in the current
cpu hotplug scenario.  Which should make the problem of doing the
work race free much easier.

I don't know if other architectures need to disable cpus or not before
doing a suspend to ram or a suspend to disk.

I also don't know if we have any code that brings up the other cpus
after we have been suspended.  In either the cpu hotplug paths or the
architecture specific paths.

The bottom line is after the partial review of the irq handling during
cpu shutdown a little while ago that I consider the current cpu
hotplug code to be something that works when you are lucky.  There are
to many hardware bugs to support the general case it tries to
implement.

I have not reviewed the entire cpu hotplug path nor have I even tried
suspend/resume.  But I have been all and down the boot and shutdown
code paths so I understand the general problem.

The other part I know is that cpu numbers are assigned at the
architectures discretion.  So unless the architecture code or the
early boot code sets a variable remembering which was the boot cpu
there is no reason to believe we can deduce it.  In addition I don't
know if any other architectures have anything resembling the x86
requirement to disable non-boot cpus.  I do know machine_shutdown
on i386 and x86_64 performs that action (if not perfectly) so at
least currently we should be able to do this in architecture
specific code.

</braindump>

Eric



From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/20] x86_64: 64bit ACPI wakeup trampoline

o Moved wakeup_level4_pgt into the wakeup routine so we can
  run the kernel above 4G.

o Now we first go to 64bit mode and continue to run from trampoline and
  then then start accessing kernel symbols and restore processor context.
  This enables us to resume even in relocatable kernel context when 
  kernel might not be loaded at physical addr it has been compiled for.

o Removed the need for modifying any existing kernel page table.

o Increased the size of the wakeup routine to 8K. This is required as
  wake page tables are on trampoline itself and they got to be at 4K
  boundary, hence one page is not sufficient.

Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
---

 arch/x86_64/kernel/acpi/sleep.c  |   22 ++------------
 arch/x86_64/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 arch/x86_64/kernel/head.S        |    9 -----
 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/x86_64/kernel/acpi/sleep.c~x86_64-64bit-ACPI-wakeup-trampoline
arch/x86_64/kernel/acpi/sleep.c
---
linux-2.6.21-rc2-reloc/arch/x86_64/kernel/acpi/sleep.c~x86_64-64bit-ACPI-wakeup-trampoline
2007-03-07 01:28:11.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc2-reloc-root/arch/x86_64/kernel/acpi/sleep.c 2007-03-07
01:28:11.000000000 +0530
@@ -60,17 +60,6 @@ extern char wakeup_start, wakeup_end;
 
 extern unsigned long acpi_copy_wakeup_routine(unsigned long);
 
-static pgd_t low_ptr;
-
-static void init_low_mapping(void)
-{
-	pgd_t *slot0 = pgd_offset(current->mm, 0UL);
-	low_ptr = *slot0;
-	set_pgd(slot0, *pgd_offset(current->mm, PAGE_OFFSET));
-	WARN_ON(num_online_cpus() != 1);
-	local_flush_tlb();
-}
-
 /**
  * acpi_save_state_mem - save kernel state
  *
@@ -79,8 +68,6 @@ static void init_low_mapping(void)
  */
 int acpi_save_state_mem(void)
 {
-	init_low_mapping();
-
 	memcpy((void *)acpi_wakeup_address, &wakeup_start,
 	       &wakeup_end - &wakeup_start);
 	acpi_copy_wakeup_routine(acpi_wakeup_address);
@@ -93,8 +80,6 @@ int acpi_save_state_mem(void)
  */
 void acpi_restore_state_mem(void)
 {
-	set_pgd(pgd_offset(current->mm, 0UL), low_ptr);
-	local_flush_tlb();
 }
 
 /**
@@ -107,10 +92,11 @@ void acpi_restore_state_mem(void)
  */
 void __init acpi_reserve_bootmem(void)
 {
-	acpi_wakeup_address = (unsigned long)alloc_bootmem_low(PAGE_SIZE);
-	if ((&wakeup_end - &wakeup_start) > PAGE_SIZE)
+	acpi_wakeup_address = (unsigned long)alloc_bootmem_low(PAGE_SIZE*2);
+	if ((&wakeup_end - &wakeup_start) > (PAGE_SIZE*2))
 		printk(KERN_CRIT
- "ACPI: Wakeup code way too big, will crash on attempt to suspend\n");
+		       "ACPI: Wakeup code way too big, will crash on attempt"
+		       " to suspend\n");
 }
 
 static int __init acpi_sleep_setup(char *str)
diff -puN arch/x86_64/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S~x86_64-64bit-ACPI-wakeup-trampoline
arch/x86_64/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S
---
linux-2.6.21-rc2-reloc/arch/x86_64/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S~x86_64-64bit-ACPI-wakeup-trampoline
2007-03-07 01:28:11.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc2-reloc-root/arch/x86_64/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S 2007-03-07
01:28:11.000000000 +0530
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 .text
 #include <linux/linkage.h>
 #include <asm/segment.h>
+#include <asm/pgtable.h>
 #include <asm/page.h>
 #include <asm/msr.h>
 
@@ -62,12 +63,15 @@ wakeup_code:
 
 	movb	$0xa2, %al	;  outb %al, $0x80
 	
-	lidt	%ds:idt_48a - wakeup_code
-	xorl	%eax, %eax
- movw %ds, %ax # (Convert %ds:gdt to a linear ptr)
-	shll	$4, %eax
-	addl	$(gdta - wakeup_code), %eax
-	movl	%eax, gdt_48a +2 - wakeup_code
+	mov	%ds, %ax			# Find 32bit wakeup_code addr
+ movzx %ax, %esi # (Convert %ds:gdt to a liner ptr)
+	shll    $4, %esi
+						# Fix up the vectors
+	addl    %esi, wakeup_32_vector - wakeup_code
+	addl    %esi, wakeup_long64_vector - wakeup_code
+	addl    %esi, gdt_48a + 2 - wakeup_code # Fixup the gdt pointer
+
+	lidtl	%ds:idt_48a - wakeup_code
 	lgdtl	%ds:gdt_48a - wakeup_code	# load gdt with whatever is
 						# appropriate
 
@@ -80,7 +84,7 @@ wakeup_code:
 
 	.balign 4
 wakeup_32_vector:
-	.long   wakeup_32 - __START_KERNEL_map
+	.long   wakeup_32 - wakeup_code
 	.word   __KERNEL32_CS, 0
 
 	.code32
@@ -103,10 +107,6 @@ wakeup_32:
 	movl	$__KERNEL_DS, %eax
 	movl	%eax, %ds
 
-	movl	saved_magic - __START_KERNEL_map, %eax
-	cmpl	$0x9abcdef0, %eax
-	jne	bogus_32_magic
-
 	movw	$0x0e00 + 'i', %ds:(0xb8012)
 	movb	$0xa8, %al	;  outb %al, $0x80;
 
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ wakeup_32:
 	movl	%eax, %cr4
 
 	/* Setup early boot stage 4 level pagetables */
-	movl	$(wakeup_level4_pgt - __START_KERNEL_map), %eax
+	leal    (wakeup_level4_pgt - wakeup_code)(%esi), %eax
 	movl	%eax, %cr3
 
 	/* Enable Long Mode */
@@ -159,11 +159,11 @@ wakeup_32:
 	 */
 
 	/* Finally jump in 64bit mode */
-	ljmp	*(wakeup_long64_vector - __START_KERNEL_map)
+        ljmp    *(wakeup_long64_vector - wakeup_code)(%esi)
 
 	.balign 4
 wakeup_long64_vector:
-	.long   wakeup_long64 - __START_KERNEL_map
+	.long   wakeup_long64 - wakeup_code
 	.word   __KERNEL_CS, 0
 
 .code64
@@ -178,11 +178,16 @@ wakeup_long64:
 	 * addresses where we're currently running on. We have to do that here
 	 * because in 32bit we couldn't load a 64bit linear address.
 	 */
-	lgdt	cpu_gdt_descr - __START_KERNEL_map
+	lgdt	cpu_gdt_descr
 
 	movw	$0x0e00 + 'n', %ds:(0xb8014)
 	movb	$0xa9, %al	;  outb %al, $0x80
 
+	movq    saved_magic, %rax
+	movq    $0x123456789abcdef0, %rdx
+	cmpq    %rdx, %rax
+	jne     bogus_64_magic
+
 	movw	$0x0e00 + 'u', %ds:(0xb8016)
 	
 	nop
@@ -223,20 +228,21 @@ idt_48a:
 gdt_48a:
 	.word	0x800				# gdt limit=2048,
 						#  256 GDT entries
-	.word	0, 0				# gdt base (filled in later)
-	
+	.long   gdta - wakeup_code              # gdt base (relocated in later)
 	
 real_magic:	.quad 0
 video_mode:	.quad 0
 video_flags:	.quad 0
 
+.code16
 bogus_real_magic:
 	movb	$0xba,%al	;  outb %al,$0x80
 	jmp bogus_real_magic
 
-bogus_32_magic:
+.code64
+bogus_64_magic:
 	movb	$0xb3,%al	;  outb %al,$0x80
-	jmp bogus_32_magic
+	jmp bogus_64_magic
 
 bogus_cpu:
 	movb	$0xbc,%al	;  outb %al,$0x80
@@ -263,6 +269,7 @@ bogus_cpu:
 #define VIDEO_FIRST_V7 0x0900
 
 # Setting of user mode (AX=mode ID) => CF=success
+.code16
 mode_seta:
 	movw	%ax, %bx
 #if 0
@@ -313,6 +320,13 @@ wakeup_stack_begin:	# Stack grows down
 .org	0xff0
 wakeup_stack:		# Just below end of page
 
+.org   0x1000
+ENTRY(wakeup_level4_pgt)
+	.quad   level3_ident_pgt - __START_KERNEL_map + _KERNPG_TABLE
+	.fill   510,8,0
+	/* (2^48-(2*1024*1024*1024))/(2^39) = 511 */
+	.quad   level3_kernel_pgt - __START_KERNEL_map + _KERNPG_TABLE
+
 ENTRY(wakeup_end)
 	
 ##
@@ -338,9 +352,10 @@ ENTRY(acpi_copy_wakeup_routine)
 	movq	$0x123456789abcdef0, %rdx
 	movq	%rdx, saved_magic
 
-	movl	saved_magic - __START_KERNEL_map, %eax
-	cmpl	$0x9abcdef0, %eax
-	jne	bogus_32_magic
+	movq    saved_magic, %rax
+	movq    $0x123456789abcdef0, %rdx
+	cmpq    %rdx, %rax
+	jne     bogus_64_magic
 
 	# restore the regs we used
 	popq	%rdx
diff -puN arch/x86_64/kernel/head.S~x86_64-64bit-ACPI-wakeup-trampoline
arch/x86_64/kernel/head.S
---
linux-2.6.21-rc2-reloc/arch/x86_64/kernel/head.S~x86_64-64bit-ACPI-wakeup-trampoline
2007-03-07 01:28:11.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc2-reloc-root/arch/x86_64/kernel/head.S 2007-03-07
01:28:11.000000000 +0530
@@ -308,15 +308,6 @@ NEXT_PAGE(level2_kernel_pgt)
 
 	.data
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
-	.align PAGE_SIZE
-ENTRY(wakeup_level4_pgt)
-	.quad	level3_ident_pgt - __START_KERNEL_map + _KERNPG_TABLE
-	.fill	510,8,0
-	/* (2^48-(2*1024*1024*1024))/(2^39) = 511 */
-	.quad	level3_kernel_pgt - __START_KERNEL_map + _KERNPG_TABLE
-#endif
-
 #ifndef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
 	__INITDATA
 #endif
_


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Mar 16, 12:33 pm)
2.6.21-rc4: known regressions with patches (v2), Adrian Bunk, (Sat Mar 24, 7:25 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions with patches (v2), Bob Tracy, (Mon Mar 26, 8:37 am)
[3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Adrian Bunk, (Fri Mar 23, 2:50 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Marcus Better, (Mon Mar 26, 6:00 am)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Adrian Bunk, (Mon Mar 26, 10:34 am)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Marcus Better, (Mon Mar 26, 1:42 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Adrian Bunk, (Mon Mar 26, 2:48 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Marcus Better, (Tue Mar 27, 5:42 am)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Pavel Machek, (Mon Mar 26, 8:35 am)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Frédéric, (Sun Mar 25, 5:34 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Frédéric, (Mon Mar 26, 2:45 am)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Gleixner, (Mon Mar 26, 5:14 am)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Frédéric, (Mon Mar 26, 2:53 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Adrian Bunk, (Mon Mar 26, 3:02 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Frederic Riss, (Mon Mar 26, 3:39 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Adrian Bunk, (Mon Mar 26, 3:46 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Frederic Riss, (Mon Mar 26, 6:36 am)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Meyer, (Sat Mar 24, 1:04 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Eric W. Biederman, (Sat Mar 24, 2:02 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Meyer, (Sat Mar 24, 2:20 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Eric W. Biederman, (Sat Mar 24, 2:47 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Meyer, (Sat Mar 24, 4:34 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Eric W. Biederman, (Sat Mar 24, 11:39 pm)
RE: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Luck, Tony, (Mon Mar 26, 4:01 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Eric W. Biederman, (Mon Mar 26, 11:29 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Bjorn Helgaas, (Mon Apr 2, 11:38 am)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Eric W. Biederman, (Mon Apr 2, 3:50 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Bjorn Helgaas, (Mon Apr 2, 12:38 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Meyer, (Sun Mar 25, 7:41 am)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Adrian Bunk, (Sun Mar 25, 10:48 am)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Meyer, (Sun Mar 25, 1:25 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Mar 25, 3:06 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Mar 25, 3:31 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Eric W. Biederman, (Sun Mar 25, 8:03 am)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Meyer, (Sun Mar 25, 9:54 am)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Mar 25, 8:28 am)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Meyer, (Sun Mar 25, 10:17 am)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Mar 25, 2:56 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Eric W. Biederman, (Sun Mar 25, 8:56 am)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Mar 25, 3:14 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Eric W. Biederman, (Sun Mar 25, 4:37 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Mar 26, 5:03 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Mar 23, 4:53 pm)
Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Maxim, (Fri Mar 23, 3:07 pm)
[4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Adrian Bunk, (Fri Mar 23, 2:50 pm)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), john stultz, (Fri Mar 23, 5:43 pm)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Linus Torvalds, (Fri Mar 23, 5:54 pm)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), john stultz, (Fri Mar 23, 8:44 pm)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 23, 4:08 pm)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Michal Piotrowski, (Sat Mar 24, 9:59 am)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Mar 24, 11:14 am)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Michal Piotrowski, (Sat Mar 24, 12:13 pm)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 23, 4:00 pm)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 23, 3:49 pm)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 23, 3:22 pm)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Mar 24, 9:47 am)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 23, 3:15 pm)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Chuck Ebbert, (Fri Mar 23, 6:23 pm)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Adrian Bunk, (Fri Mar 23, 7:00 pm)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Chuck Ebbert, (Fri Mar 23, 7:05 pm)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 23, 6:43 pm)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 23, 7:35 pm)
[PATCH] clocksource: Fix thinko in watchdog selection, Thomas Gleixner, (Sun Mar 25, 8:42 am)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Adrian Bunk, (Fri Mar 23, 3:15 pm)
Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 23, 3:21 pm)
[5/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Adrian Bunk, (Fri Mar 23, 2:50 pm)
[2/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Adrian Bunk, (Fri Mar 23, 2:48 pm)
Re: [2/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Tejun Heo, (Mon Mar 26, 6:01 am)
Re: [2/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Ray Lee, (Fri Mar 23, 8:14 pm)
Re: [2/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Mar 24, 2:40 am)
Re: [2/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Ray Lee, (Sat Mar 24, 2:17 pm)
Re: [2/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 23, 5:08 pm)
[1/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Adrian Bunk, (Fri Mar 23, 2:48 pm)
Re: [1/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), David Miller, (Sun Mar 25, 12:45 am)
Re: [1/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Adrian Bunk, (Sun Mar 25, 8:22 am)
Re: [1/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2), Paul Collins, (Sun Mar 25, 1:08 am)
2.6.21-rc4: known regressions with patches available, Adrian Bunk, (Mon Mar 19, 4:39 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Takashi Iwai, (Fri Mar 16, 1:01 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Michal Piotrowski, (Fri Mar 16, 1:44 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Takashi Iwai, (Fri Mar 16, 2:54 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Michal Piotrowski, (Fri Mar 16, 3:03 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Adrian Bunk, (Sat Mar 17, 7:46 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Michal Piotrowski, (Sun Mar 18, 9:04 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Andrew Morton, (Fri Mar 16, 2:26 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Michal Piotrowski, (Fri Mar 16, 2:55 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Jan Engelhardt, (Fri Mar 16, 7:23 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Michal Piotrowski, (Fri Mar 16, 7:31 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Mariusz Kozlowski, (Sat Mar 17, 4:19 am)
[6/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Mar 18, 2:49 pm)
Re: [6/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, David Miller, (Mon Mar 19, 10:38 pm)
Re: [6/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, David Miller, (Sat Mar 24, 3:50 pm)
[5/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Mar 18, 2:49 pm)
Re: [5/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Maxim, (Sun Mar 18, 3:07 pm)
Re: [5/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Mar 18, 3:22 pm)
Re: [5/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Maxim, (Sun Mar 18, 3:59 pm)
Re: [5/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Maxim, (Sun Mar 18, 4:03 pm)
[4/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Mar 18, 2:49 pm)
[3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Mar 18, 2:49 pm)
Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Jeff Chua, (Sun Mar 25, 9:25 pm)
Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Adrian Bunk, (Mon Mar 26, 12:05 am)
Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Jeff Chua, (Mon Mar 26, 1:37 am)
Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Thomas Gleixner, (Mon Mar 26, 12:26 pm)
Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Jeff Chua, (Mon Mar 26, 1:46 pm)
Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Mar 28, 3:04 am)
Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Maxim, (Wed Mar 28, 9:43 am)
Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Wed Mar 28, 2:04 pm)
Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Jeff Chua, (Thu Mar 29, 10:24 am)
Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Randy Dunlap, (Wed Mar 28, 2:35 pm)
Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Mar 28, 2:32 pm)
Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Mar 28, 10:41 am)
Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Maxim, (Wed Mar 28, 11:01 am)
Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Mar 28, 12:38 pm)
Re: [patch, v2] add suspend/resume for HPET, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 29, 1:47 pm)
[PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Maxim Levitsky, (Thu Mar 29, 9:46 am)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Mar 31, 11:51 am)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Maxim Levitsky, (Sat Mar 31, 12:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Mar 31, 1:09 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 31, 1:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Daniel Walker, (Sat Mar 31, 1:58 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Mar 31, 12:09 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Mar 31, 12:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Mar 31, 12:53 pm)
Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, David Brownell, (Sat Mar 31, 1:55 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Greg KH, (Sat Mar 31, 1:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 31, 1:02 pm)
Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, David Brownell, (Sat Mar 31, 2:18 pm)
Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, David Brownell, (Sat Mar 31, 3:32 pm)
Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, David Brownell, (Sun Apr 1, 12:13 am)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Greg KH, (Sat Mar 31, 12:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Jeff Chua, (Sat Mar 31, 12:01 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Mar 31, 12:09 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Jeff Chua, (Thu Mar 29, 2:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Mar 29, 12:53 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 29, 1:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Andi Kleen, (Thu Mar 29, 4:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET, Maxim Levitsky, (Thu Mar 29, 1:28 pm)
Re: [linux-pm] [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, David Brownell, (Wed Mar 28, 3:38 pm)
Re: [linux-pm] [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Mar 28, 4:42 pm)
Re: [linux-pm] [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, David Brownell, (Wed Mar 28, 5:17 pm)
Re: [linux-pm] [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, David Brownell, (Wed Mar 28, 4:59 pm)
Re: [linux-pm] [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, David Brownell, (Thu Mar 29, 6:33 pm)
Re: [linux-pm] [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Maxim Levitsky, (Thu Mar 29, 7:29 pm)
Re: [linux-pm] [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, David Brownell, (Thu Mar 29, 8:09 pm)
Re: [linux-pm] [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Maxim Levitsky, (Thu Mar 29, 8:48 pm)
[2/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Mar 18, 2:49 pm)
Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Ray Lee, (Tue Mar 20, 11:32 am)
Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Mar 19, 12:06 pm)
Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Adrian Bunk, (Mon Mar 19, 12:15 pm)
Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Mar 19, 1:07 pm)
Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Andi Kleen, (Sun Mar 18, 3:25 pm)
[1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Mar 18, 2:49 pm)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Mar 21, 11:45 pm)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Nick Piggin, (Thu Mar 22, 12:18 am)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Mariusz , (Thu Mar 22, 2:24 pm)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Mar 22, 11:21 am)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Mingming Cao, (Thu Mar 22, 9:08 pm)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Mar 22, 9:40 pm)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Mar 23, 8:27 am)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Mar 23, 7:42 am)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 23, 7:56 am)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Mar 23, 2:13 pm)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Mar 23, 2:16 pm)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Mar 23, 2:28 pm)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 23, 2:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH] i386: add command line option "local_apic_timer_..., Grzegorz Chwesewicz, (Thu Mar 29, 5:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH] i386: add command line option "local_apic_timer_..., Grzegorz Chwesewicz, (Thu Mar 29, 5:55 pm)
Re: [PATCH] i386: add command line option "local_apic_timer_..., Grzegorz Chwesewicz, (Sat Mar 31, 3:47 am)
Re: [PATCH] i386: add command line option "local_apic_timer_..., Grzegorz Chwesewicz, (Fri Mar 30, 5:06 pm)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Nick Piggin, (Thu Mar 22, 10:11 pm)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Michal Piotrowski, (Fri Mar 23, 3:51 am)
[patch] hrtimers debug patch, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Mar 23, 8:01 am)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Nick Piggin, (Fri Mar 23, 5:37 am)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Adrian Bunk, (Fri Mar 23, 1:19 pm)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Tobias Diedrich, (Tue Mar 20, 6:24 am)
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Mar 20, 7:14 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Mar 16, 4:34 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 16, 4:47 pm)
[PATCH] clockevents: Fix suspend/resume to disk hangs, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 16, 7:25 pm)
appletouch quirk doesn't run at resume, Adrian Bunk, (Sat Mar 17, 8:42 pm)
Re: appletouch quirk doesn't run at resume, Jiri Kosina, (Sun Mar 18, 2:45 pm)
Re: appletouch quirk doesn't run at resume, Thomas Meyer, (Sun Mar 18, 3:01 pm)
Re: appletouch quirk doesn't run at resume, Jiri Kosina, (Sun Mar 18, 3:22 pm)
Re: appletouch quirk doesn't run at resume, Thomas Meyer, (Tue Mar 27, 5:02 pm)
Re: appletouch quirk doesn't run at resume, Jiri Kosina, (Wed Mar 28, 8:26 am)
Re: appletouch quirk doesn't run at resume, Dmitry Torokhov, (Wed Mar 28, 9:24 am)
Re: appletouch quirk doesn't run at resume, Thomas Meyer, (Wed Mar 28, 12:51 pm)
Re: appletouch quirk doesn't run at resume, Jiri Kosina, (Wed Mar 28, 1:06 pm)
Re: appletouch quirk doesn't run at resume, Dmitry Torokhov, (Wed Mar 28, 1:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH] clockevents: Fix suspend/resume to disk hangs, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Mar 17, 5:47 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Randy Dunlap, (Fri Mar 16, 5:11 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Randy Dunlap, (Fri Mar 16, 6:39 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Chris Friesen, (Fri Mar 16, 7:13 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Jan Engelhardt, (Fri Mar 16, 7:27 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Sam Ravnborg, (Sat Mar 17, 2:43 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Sam Ravnborg, (Sun Mar 18, 8:39 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Mar 19, 12:16 am)