On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
quoted text
> 
> The code never did that. In fact many of the problems we had initially
> especially came out of that -- the fallback code that would handle
> this case wasn't fully correct.

I don't keep my emails any more, but you *never* fixed the problems in 
arch/*/kernel/traps.c.

Yes, the kernel/unwind.c issues generally got fixed. The infinite loops in 
the *callers* never did.

quoted text
> Also frankly often your analysis about what went wrong was just
> incorrect.

Still in denial, I see.

Do you still claim that "the fallback position always did the right 
thing"? Despite the fact that the unwinder had sometimes *corrupted* the 
incoming information so much that the fallback position was the one that 
oopsed? And no, you didn't fix that.

And no, IT DID NOT use probe_kernel_address like you still claim.

Anyway, you work for Suse, I don't care what you do to the Suse kernel. 
Maybe it will get stable some day. Somehow, I doubt it. 

			Linus
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/