Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Friday, March 2, 2007 - 12:14 am

* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:


no - i simply picked them by hand, based on looking at gittk output, 
because bisection did not appear to find anything useful:

  9f4bd5dde81b5cb94e4f52f2f05825aa0422f1ff is first bad commit

And via that method i found a couple of more 'good' points - which 
git-bisect never picked up by itself. (and i did 3-4 separate git-bisect 
sessions, one of them was a "git-bisect start drivers/acpi/" - which is 
the main area of suspicion). I looked at git-bisect visualize more than 
once, and i've attached one of the bisection logs below.

i also think i know what happens. Firstly, my testing is reliable, as i 
mentioned it in the other mail i frequently re-visited commits to make 
sure that none of my bad/good decisions is spurios - but no, the test 
results are extremely reproducable: either the laptop resumes properly 
after flashing its disk light or it does not.

the problem i think is that i simply took git-bisect's behavior for 
granted (i used it many times already) but forgot about a very basic 
precondition: git-bisect will find only a /single/ good->bad transition.

If there is a bad->good transition combined with a good->bad transition 
then git-bisect will think it's the same 'badness', while it's a 
/former/ badness that it is honing in on - totally sending the bisection 
off into la-la-land.

so as i mentioned it in the first mail: i /know/ that this commit is a 
bad->good transition point:

  f3ccb06f3b8e0cf42b579db21f3ca7f17fcc3f38

/and i only want to test commits that include this commit/ - because i 
know that without this commit git-bisect confuses the /other/ breakage 
with the new breakage. In the bisection log below, this choice of 
git-bisect:

  ee404566f97f9254433399fbbcfa05390c7c55f7

is 'bad' according to testing, but that's 'another' badness - and i 
missed it.

Now, having slept on it, the solution is very simple: whenever 
git-bisect picks a commit for which the following command comes up 
empty:
 
  git-log | grep f3ccb06f3b8e0cf42b579db21f3ca7f17fcc3f38

then i'll mark it "git-bisect good" - artificially marking the older 
badness as a 'good' area. That way git-bisect will find the right 
good->bad transition point.

btw., that's why i tried to pick up commits by hand, making sure that 
commit f3ccb06f3b8e0cf42b579db21f3ca7f17fcc3f38 is always included - but 
got lost in the maze of the commit graph, and didnt realize that there 
is a simple solution. Nevertheless i wanted to dump the information i 
already gathered. Those commits were totally out of order, etc. - they 
were picked by a poor human who is much worse at walking graphs than 
git-bisect ;-)

	Ingo

git-bisect start
# bad: [01363220f5d23ef68276db8974e46a502e43d01d] [PARISC] clocksource: Move update_cr16_clocksource later in boot
git-bisect bad 01363220f5d23ef68276db8974e46a502e43d01d
# good: [f3ccb06f3b8e0cf42b579db21f3ca7f17fcc3f38] ACPI: Disable wake GPEs only once.
git-bisect good f3ccb06f3b8e0cf42b579db21f3ca7f17fcc3f38
# bad: [ee404566f97f9254433399fbbcfa05390c7c55f7] sysctl: mips/au1000: remove sys_sysctl support
git-bisect bad ee404566f97f9254433399fbbcfa05390c7c55f7
# bad: [c827ba4cb49a30ce581201fd0ba2be77cde412c7] Merge master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc-2.6
git-bisect bad c827ba4cb49a30ce581201fd0ba2be77cde412c7
# bad: [68a696a01f482859a9fe937249e8b3d44252b610] Merge branch 'upstream' of git://ftp.linux-mips.org/pub/scm/upstream-tc
git-bisect bad 68a696a01f482859a9fe937249e8b3d44252b610
# bad: [1c433fbda4896a6455d97b66a4f2646cbdd52a8c] [ALSA] soc - 0.13 ASoC headers
git-bisect bad 1c433fbda4896a6455d97b66a4f2646cbdd52a8c
# bad: [048b945077bdc7e8dff5d5810ff2a0ced3590ca9] [ALSA] echoaudio, add TLV support
git-bisect bad 048b945077bdc7e8dff5d5810ff2a0ced3590ca9
# bad: [c07584c83287ae5a13cc836f69a1d824ad068c66] [ALSA] hda-codec - Add support for Medion laptops
git-bisect bad c07584c83287ae5a13cc836f69a1d824ad068c66
# bad: [dbc6b6ad767c86907db373e85139b0e975ba7599] [ALSA] ASoC codecs: generic AC97 support
git-bisect bad dbc6b6ad767c86907db373e85139b0e975ba7599
# bad: [b66b3cfe6c2f6560f351278883a325b6ebc478f5] [ALSA] hda_intel: increase maximum DMA buffer size to 1024MB
git-bisect bad b66b3cfe6c2f6560f351278883a325b6ebc478f5
# bad: [12b131c4cf3eb1dc8a60082a434b7b100774c2e7] [ALSA] allow registering an alsa device with struct device pointer
git-bisect bad 12b131c4cf3eb1dc8a60082a434b7b100774c2e7
# bad: [e4f8e656d8c152c08cd44d0e3c21f009fab09952] [ALSA] usb-audio: allow pausing
git-bisect bad e4f8e656d8c152c08cd44d0e3c21f009fab09952
# bad: [1700f3080d98323e91864d67cb9f6d46f818ccf0] [ALSA] usb-audio: merge playback/capture hardware information structs
git-bisect bad 1700f3080d98323e91864d67cb9f6d46f818ccf0
# bad: [9f4bd5dde81b5cb94e4f52f2f05825aa0422f1ff] [ALSA] snd-emu10k1: Added support for emu1010, including E-Mu 1212m and E-Mu 1820m
git-bisect bad 9f4bd5dde81b5cb94e4f52f2f05825aa0422f1ff
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Feb 20, 9:53 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Faik Uygur, (Wed Feb 21, 6:26 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 21, 6:32 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Kok, Auke, (Wed Feb 21, 8:58 am)
request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-1 (is Re: Lin ..., YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / , (Wed Feb 21, 9:23 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Daniel Walker, (Wed Feb 21, 9:24 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 21, 10:07 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Daniel Walker, (Wed Feb 21, 10:19 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Daniel Walker, (Wed Feb 21, 10:38 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 21, 10:41 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 21, 11:18 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Daniel Walker, (Wed Feb 21, 11:23 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Andreas Schwab, (Wed Feb 21, 11:34 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Dave Jones, (Wed Feb 21, 11:40 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Jiri Slaby, (Wed Feb 21, 11:41 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Jiri Slaby, (Wed Feb 21, 11:51 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Feb 21, 12:19 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 21, 12:23 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Feb 21, 12:24 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Daniel Walker, (Wed Feb 21, 12:24 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Andrew Morton, (Wed Feb 21, 12:45 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Daniel Walker, (Wed Feb 21, 1:00 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Feb 21, 1:18 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 21, 1:43 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Daniel Walker, (Wed Feb 21, 1:49 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Feb 21, 2:06 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 21, 2:21 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Daniel Walker, (Wed Feb 21, 2:23 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1 [git bisect], Pete Harlan, (Wed Feb 21, 3:05 pm)
NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Luca Tettamanti, (Wed Feb 21, 4:04 pm)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 21, 4:17 pm)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Luca Tettamanti, (Wed Feb 21, 4:19 pm)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Jan Engelhardt, (Thu Feb 22, 5:36 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Feb 22, 6:25 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Pierre Ossman, (Thu Feb 22, 7:10 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Feb 22, 7:20 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Pierre Ossman, (Thu Feb 22, 7:51 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Pierre Ossman, (Thu Feb 22, 8:13 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Feb 22, 8:51 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Feb 22, 9:00 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Pierre Ossman, (Thu Feb 22, 9:27 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Feb 22, 9:42 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck, David Miller, (Thu Feb 22, 10:26 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck, Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Feb 22, 10:39 am)
RE: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Thu Feb 22, 12:58 pm)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Pierre Ossman, (Thu Feb 22, 2:07 pm)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Andreas Mohr, (Thu Feb 22, 2:25 pm)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Feb 22, 3:21 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1 -- suspend, Pavel Machek, (Thu Feb 22, 10:25 pm)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1], Pierre Ossman, (Thu Feb 22, 11:55 pm)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck, David Miller, (Fri Feb 23, 2:25 am)
Re: sparc generic time / clockevents, David Miller, (Fri Feb 23, 2:55 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Andrew Morton, (Fri Feb 23, 3:08 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Feb 23, 4:35 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Feb 23, 4:39 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Feb 23, 4:47 am)
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck, Andi Kleen, (Fri Feb 23, 8:50 am)
Re: sparc generic time / clockevents, john stultz, (Fri Feb 23, 12:51 pm)
Re: sparc generic time / clockevents, Peter Keilty, (Fri Feb 23, 3:15 pm)
Re: sparc generic time / clockevents, David Miller, (Fri Feb 23, 5:34 pm)
Re: sparc generic time / clockevents, john stultz, (Fri Feb 23, 5:53 pm)
Re: sparc generic time / clockevents, David Miller, (Fri Feb 23, 10:52 pm)
2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 1), Adrian Bunk, (Sun Feb 25, 10:52 am)
2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Adrian Bunk, (Sun Feb 25, 10:55 am)
2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 3), Adrian Bunk, (Sun Feb 25, 11:02 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 3), Greg KH, (Sun Feb 25, 1:59 pm)
2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Adrian Bunk, (Mon Feb 26, 3:01 pm)
2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Adrian Bunk, (Mon Feb 26, 3:05 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Feb 27, 1:21 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Tue Feb 27, 1:33 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Michal Piotrowski, (Tue Feb 27, 1:33 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Michal Piotrowski, (Tue Feb 27, 1:35 am)
regression: forcedeth.c hang, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Feb 27, 1:39 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Mike Galbraith, (Tue Feb 27, 1:54 am)
Re: regression: forcedeth.c hang, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Feb 27, 2:01 am)
Re: regression: forcedeth.c hang, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Feb 27, 2:38 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Jens Axboe, (Tue Feb 27, 3:02 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Pavel Machek, (Tue Feb 27, 3:21 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Jens Axboe, (Tue Feb 27, 3:30 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Tue Feb 27, 3:34 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Jens Axboe, (Tue Feb 27, 3:59 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Jens Axboe, (Tue Feb 27, 4:15 am)
Re: regression: forcedeth.c hang, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Feb 27, 4:25 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Meelis Roos, (Tue Feb 27, 6:00 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Jens Axboe, (Tue Feb 27, 6:09 am)
Re: regression: forcedeth.c hang, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Feb 27, 8:42 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Adrian Bunk, (Tue Feb 27, 3:09 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Con Kolivas, (Tue Feb 27, 4:07 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Mike Galbraith, (Tue Feb 27, 9:21 pm)
Re: regression: forcedeth.c hang, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Feb 28, 12:36 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Jens Axboe, (Wed Feb 28, 12:41 am)
RE: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 1), Karasyov, Konstantin A, (Wed Feb 28, 11:16 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Michael S. Tsirkin, (Wed Feb 28, 2:13 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Feb 28, 2:27 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Michael S. Tsirkin, (Wed Feb 28, 2:40 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Con Kolivas, (Wed Feb 28, 3:01 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Mike Galbraith, (Wed Feb 28, 5:02 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Jeff Chua, (Wed Feb 28, 8:45 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 1, 1:46 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 1, 2:34 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 1, 3:41 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Con Kolivas, (Thu Mar 1, 4:13 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Mar 1, 4:33 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Con Kolivas, (Thu Mar 1, 5:05 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Mar 1, 5:20 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 1, 6:30 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 1, 7:52 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Mar 1, 9:12 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2), Con Kolivas, (Thu Mar 1, 2:51 pm)
[PATCH] sched: remove SMT nice, Con Kolivas, (Thu Mar 1, 3:33 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Linus Torvalds, (Thu Mar 1, 4:36 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Linus Torvalds, (Thu Mar 1, 5:26 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Linus Torvalds, (Thu Mar 1, 5:41 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Fri Mar 2, 12:14 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Fri Mar 2, 12:21 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Fri Mar 2, 1:04 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Pavel Machek, (Fri Mar 2, 3:07 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Fri Mar 2, 3:20 am)
[patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Mar 2, 3:22 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Fri Mar 2, 4:39 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Avi Kivity, (Sat Mar 3, 1:21 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Avi Kivity, (Sat Mar 3, 1:22 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Andrew Morton, (Sat Mar 3, 4:57 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Junio C Hamano, (Sat Mar 3, 5:07 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Adrian Bunk, (Sun Mar 4, 5:04 pm)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 1:22 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 5, 1:42 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 1:44 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Avi Kivity, (Mon Mar 5, 1:50 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 1:57 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Avi Kivity, (Mon Mar 5, 2:27 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 3:05 am)
SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 3:11 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 5, 3:23 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 3:29 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Avi Kivity, (Mon Mar 5, 3:33 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 3:33 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 5, 3:40 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 5:50 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 5, 5:54 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 5, 6:26 am)
Re: [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 6:32 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 5, 8:34 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 5, 8:44 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 5, 9:14 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 5, 9:41 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Jens Axboe, (Mon Mar 5, 11:16 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Jeff Chua, (Mon Mar 5, 6:32 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Jeff Garzik, (Mon Mar 5, 10:30 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Kok, Auke, (Mon Mar 5, 11:35 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Mar 6, 2:04 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Mar 6, 2:06 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Jeff Chua, (Tue Mar 6, 5:03 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Michael S. Tsirkin, (Tue Mar 6, 5:08 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Jeff Chua, (Tue Mar 6, 5:12 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Kok, Auke, (Tue Mar 6, 8:34 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Mar 6, 9:26 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Mar 6, 9:52 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Kok, Auke, (Tue Mar 6, 10:09 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Tue Mar 6, 9:15 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Kok, Auke, (Wed Mar 7, 9:31 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Kok, Auke, (Wed Mar 7, 9:45 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Wed Mar 7, 12:28 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Andrew Morton, (Wed Mar 7, 7:53 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Wed Mar 7, 11:58 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Jeff Garzik, (Thu Mar 8, 2:55 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Thu Mar 8, 3:23 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Mar 8, 10:27 am)
[PATCH 0/2] Repair pci_restore_state when used with device ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Mar 8, 12:58 pm)
[PATCH 1/2] msi: Safer state caching., Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Mar 8, 1:04 pm)
Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2), Pavel Machek, (Thu Mar 8, 11:44 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Kok, Auke, (Fri Mar 9, 4:06 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Fri Mar 9, 8:41 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Sun Mar 11, 4:11 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Sun Mar 11, 4:24 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Sun Mar 11, 10:37 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Sun Mar 11, 11:03 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Sun Mar 11, 11:27 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Sun Mar 11, 11:37 am)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Eric W. Biederman, (Sun Mar 11, 12:50 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Sun Mar 11, 9:35 pm)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Pavel Machek, (Mon Mar 19, 8:32 am)
Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Mar 19, 2:23 pm)
Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Apr 16, 12:56 pm)