Re: RSDL v0.31

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Al Boldi
Date: Saturday, March 17, 2007 - 1:55 pm

Mike Galbraith wrote:

Mike, I'm not saying RSDL is perfect, but v0.31 is by far better than 
mainline.  Try this easy test:

startx with the vesa driver
run reflect from the mesa5.0-demos
load 5 cpu-hogs
start moving the mouse

On my desktop, mainline completely breaks down, and no nicing may rescue.

On RSDL, even without nicing, the desktop is at least useable.

What we need is constructive criticism to improve the situation, either with 
mainline or with RSDL.  And for now RSDL is better.


Thanks!

--
Al

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RSDL development plans, Con Kolivas, (Tue Mar 13, 4:08 pm)
Re: RSDL development plans, Con Kolivas, (Fri Mar 16, 5:25 am)
RSDL v0.31, Con Kolivas, (Fri Mar 16, 6:40 am)
Re: RSDL development plans, Mike Galbraith, (Fri Mar 16, 6:42 am)
Re: RSDL development plans, Con Kolivas, (Fri Mar 16, 6:59 am)
Re: RSDL development plans, Mike Galbraith, (Fri Mar 16, 7:07 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Fri Mar 16, 8:34 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, AshMilsted, (Fri Mar 16, 10:12 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Gabriel C, (Fri Mar 16, 10:41 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Con Kolivas, (Fri Mar 16, 2:13 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Al Boldi, (Fri Mar 16, 2:55 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Fri Mar 16, 3:30 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Dirk Schoebel, (Fri Mar 16, 4:05 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Con Kolivas, (Fri Mar 16, 7:51 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Nicholas Miell, (Fri Mar 16, 9:24 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Al Boldi, (Fri Mar 16, 9:40 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Con Kolivas, (Fri Mar 16, 9:57 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Gene Heskett, (Fri Mar 16, 10:15 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Fri Mar 16, 10:56 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Fri Mar 16, 11:08 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Nicholas Miell, (Fri Mar 16, 11:26 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 12:11 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, William Lee Irwin III, (Sat Mar 17, 12:25 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Nicholas Miell, (Sat Mar 17, 12:29 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, David Lang, (Sat Mar 17, 12:44 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 17, 12:45 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 17, 12:56 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Nicholas Miell, (Sat Mar 17, 1:23 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Serge Belyshev, (Sat Mar 17, 1:41 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 1:46 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Con Kolivas, (Sat Mar 17, 2:48 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 2:58 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 3:49 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, jos poortvliet, (Sat Mar 17, 4:07 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Gene Heskett, (Sat Mar 17, 4:48 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 17, 4:49 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Con Kolivas, (Sat Mar 17, 5:02 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Gene Heskett, (Sat Mar 17, 5:05 am)
Re: [ck] Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, jos poortvliet, (Sat Mar 17, 5:15 am)
Re: [ck] Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, jos poortvliet, (Sat Mar 17, 5:23 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 17, 5:28 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Con Kolivas, (Sat Mar 17, 5:43 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 17, 5:44 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 6:36 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, jos poortvliet, (Sat Mar 17, 6:44 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ed Tomlinson, (Sat Mar 17, 6:50 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ed Tomlinson, (Sat Mar 17, 6:56 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, michael chang, (Sat Mar 17, 6:58 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Ed Tomlinson, (Sat Mar 17, 7:04 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Mark Glines, (Sat Mar 17, 7:09 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Rik van Riel, (Sat Mar 17, 7:32 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 7:33 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 7:43 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Mark Glines, (Sat Mar 17, 7:54 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 7:58 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mark Hahn, (Sat Mar 17, 8:13 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 17, 8:39 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Al Boldi, (Sat Mar 17, 9:12 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 17, 9:34 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Gene Heskett, (Sat Mar 17, 10:03 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Stephen Clark, (Sat Mar 17, 10:22 am)
RE: [ck] Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, David Schwartz, (Sat Mar 17, 10:31 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 10:37 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Kacper Wysocki, (Sat Mar 17, 11:23 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 11:45 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Avi Kivity, (Sat Mar 17, 1:41 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Al Boldi, (Sat Mar 17, 1:55 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, William Lee Irwin III, (Sat Mar 17, 6:25 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Mar 17, 6:32 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Bill Davidsen, (Sat Mar 17, 7:13 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Kasper Sandberg, (Sat Mar 17, 8:20 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Bill Davidsen, (Sat Mar 17, 8:23 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Avi Kivity, (Sat Mar 17, 10:00 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Willy Tarreau, (Sat Mar 17, 10:24 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 10:37 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Avi Kivity, (Sat Mar 17, 10:55 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Bill Huey, (Sat Mar 17, 11:09 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 11:17 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 11:26 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 11:37 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Kasper Sandberg, (Sat Mar 17, 11:47 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Radoslaw Szkodzinski, (Sat Mar 17, 11:54 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Mar 18, 12:08 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Radoslaw Szkodzinski, (Sun Mar 18, 12:22 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Bill Huey, (Sun Mar 18, 12:35 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Mar 18, 12:38 am)
Re: [ck] Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Willy Tarreau, (Sun Mar 18, 12:58 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Mar 18, 1:04 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, jimmy bahuleyan, (Sun Mar 18, 1:20 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Mar 18, 1:34 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Kasper Sandberg, (Sun Mar 18, 2:57 am)
Re: [ck] Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, jos poortvliet, (Sun Mar 18, 3:58 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Avuton Olrich, (Sun Mar 18, 6:57 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Radoslaw Szkodzinski, (Sun Mar 18, 8:44 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, jos poortvliet, (Sun Mar 18, 9:09 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Lee Revell, (Sun Mar 18, 12:37 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Mar 18, 12:55 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Szonyi Calin, (Sun Mar 18, 3:45 pm)
RE: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, David Schwartz, (Sun Mar 18, 7:27 pm)
RE: RSDL v0.31, David Schwartz, (Sun Mar 18, 7:27 pm)
RE: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Mar 18, 11:21 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Willy Tarreau, (Sun Mar 18, 11:59 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Radoslaw Szkodzinski, (Mon Mar 19, 6:27 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Chris Friesen, (Mon Mar 19, 8:06 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Avi Kivity, (Mon Mar 19, 8:25 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mark Lord, (Mon Mar 19, 9:03 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Helge Hafting, (Mon Mar 19, 9:06 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mark Lord, (Mon Mar 19, 9:07 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Xavier Bestel, (Mon Mar 19, 9:26 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mark Lord, (Mon Mar 19, 9:36 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Avi Kivity, (Mon Mar 19, 9:37 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Xavier Bestel, (Mon Mar 19, 9:43 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, David Lang, (Mon Mar 19, 11:30 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Bill Davidsen, (Mon Mar 19, 1:47 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Al Boldi, (Mon Mar 19, 1:53 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Bill Davidsen, (Mon Mar 19, 2:14 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Mar 19, 8:11 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Willy Tarreau, (Mon Mar 19, 11:11 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Tue Mar 20, 1:03 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Xavier Bestel, (Tue Mar 20, 2:03 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, jos poortvliet, (Tue Mar 20, 3:19 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, jos poortvliet, (Tue Mar 20, 3:26 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Artur Skawina, (Tue Mar 20, 5:31 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mark Lord, (Tue Mar 20, 6:22 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ray Lee, (Tue Mar 20, 8:16 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mark Lord, (Tue Mar 20, 8:20 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Mar 20, 8:31 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Al Boldi, (Tue Mar 20, 11:08 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Artur Skawina, (Tue Mar 20, 12:16 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Artur Skawina, (Tue Mar 20, 12:50 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Al Boldi, (Tue Mar 20, 9:15 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Mar 21, 12:50 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Keith Duthie, (Wed Mar 21, 1:22 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Kasper Sandberg, (Wed Mar 21, 1:55 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Kasper Sandberg, (Wed Mar 21, 1:58 am)
RE: RSDL v0.31, David Schwartz, (Wed Mar 21, 3:43 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Wed Mar 21, 7:57 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Peter Zijlstra, (Wed Mar 21, 9:02 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Wed Mar 21, 10:06 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Artur Skawina, (Wed Mar 21, 10:24 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Thu Mar 22, 12:07 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 22, 2:18 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Thu Mar 22, 2:34 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Thu Mar 22, 2:41 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Con Kolivas, (Thu Mar 22, 3:03 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Con Kolivas, (Thu Mar 22, 3:50 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Thu Mar 22, 9:39 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Con Kolivas, (Thu Mar 22, 10:59 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Thu Mar 22, 11:11 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Fri Mar 23, 5:17 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Bill Davidsen, (Wed Mar 28, 4:37 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Bill Davidsen, (Wed Mar 28, 4:43 pm)
RE: RSDL v0.31, David Schwartz, (Thu Mar 29, 12:10 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Nick Piggin, (Thu Mar 29, 12:34 am)