* jos poortvliet <jos@mijnkamer.nl> wrote:

quoted text
> Op Saturday 17 March 2007, schreef Ingo Molnar:
> > so it is not at all clear to me that RSDL is indeed an improvement, 
> > if it does not have comparable auto-nice properties.
> 
> Wasn't the point of RSDL to get rid of the auto-nice, because it 
> caused starvation, unpredictable behaviour and other problems?

it doesnt really get rid of it, it replaces it with another mechanism 
that is fundamentally unfair too.

RSDL has _another_, albeit more hidden "auto-nice" behavior: this time 
expressed not via the plain manipulation of priorities based on the 
sleep average, but expressed via the quota-depletion flux of tasks over 
time, fed into a complex dance of rotating priorities - which 
quota-depletion flux is in essence a sleep average too, just more 
derived and more hardcoded.

or looking at it from another angle, code size:

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
  15750      24    6008   21782    5516 sched.o.vanilla
  15960     360    6336   22656    5880 sched.o.rsdl

there's no reduction in complexity, it just moved elsewhere.

	Ingo
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/