On Saturday 17 March 2007 08:55, Al Boldi wrote:Thank you. You should find most of your latency concerns you brought up have been addressed by this change. Not sure what you mean by that. It's still a fair distribution system, it's just that nice -10 has quite a bit more cpu allocated than nice 0. Eventually if you throw enough load at it it will slow down too. You will find that is the case already with this version. Even under heavy load if you were to be running one server niced (say httpd nice 19 in the presence of mysql nice 0) the latencies would be drastically reduced compared to mainline behaviour. I am aware this becomes an issue for some heavily loaded servers because some servers run multithreaded while others do not, forcing the admins to nice their multithreaded ones. -- -ck -
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.25-rc4 |
| Greg KH | Linux 2.6.25.10 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Ilpo Järvinen | Re: Strange Application bug, race in MSG_PEEK complaints (was: Bug#513695: fetchma... |
