login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [patch 00/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Andi Kleen <ak@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <virtualization@...>, <xen-devel@...>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...>, Zachary Amsden <zach@...>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...>
Date: Friday, March 16, 2007 - 2:59 pm

On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 10:26:55AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

This is ifdefing is quite ugly.  Shouldn't native_kmap_atomic_pte
just be a noop in the !CONFIG_HIGHPTE case?


We normally call our "secial" function __foo, not _foo.  But in this
case it really should have a more meaningfull name like
kmap_atomic_prot anyway.


And this one should probably be an inline.


This is all getting rather ugly just for your pagetable hackery.

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 00/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation for..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Mar 1, 7:24 pm)
Re: [patch 00/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Mar 16, 1:26 pm)
Re: [patch 00/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation..., Christoph Hellwig, (Fri Mar 16, 2:59 pm)
Re: [patch 00/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Mar 16, 3:26 pm)
Re: [patch 00/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Mar 16, 12:55 pm)
speck-geostationary