Re: RSDL v0.31

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: AshMilsted
Date: Friday, March 16, 2007 - 10:12 am

Con Kolivas writes:


Hi, I tried to send this before but I'm not sure it got through.
All I wanted to say was that this version does not improve my
problem with Wengophone (tested with 2.6.21-rc4). Otherwise it
seems to run fine. I won't be able to test anything new for
about a month, but I guess by then it'll be perfect anyway :)

Ash
---------------------------------------------
Free POP3 Email from www.Gawab.com 
Sign up NOW and get your account @gawab.com!!
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RSDL development plans, Con Kolivas, (Tue Mar 13, 4:08 pm)
Re: RSDL development plans, Con Kolivas, (Fri Mar 16, 5:25 am)
RSDL v0.31, Con Kolivas, (Fri Mar 16, 6:40 am)
Re: RSDL development plans, Mike Galbraith, (Fri Mar 16, 6:42 am)
Re: RSDL development plans, Con Kolivas, (Fri Mar 16, 6:59 am)
Re: RSDL development plans, Mike Galbraith, (Fri Mar 16, 7:07 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Fri Mar 16, 8:34 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, AshMilsted, (Fri Mar 16, 10:12 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Gabriel C, (Fri Mar 16, 10:41 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Con Kolivas, (Fri Mar 16, 2:13 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Al Boldi, (Fri Mar 16, 2:55 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Fri Mar 16, 3:30 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Dirk Schoebel, (Fri Mar 16, 4:05 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Con Kolivas, (Fri Mar 16, 7:51 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Nicholas Miell, (Fri Mar 16, 9:24 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Al Boldi, (Fri Mar 16, 9:40 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Con Kolivas, (Fri Mar 16, 9:57 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Gene Heskett, (Fri Mar 16, 10:15 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Fri Mar 16, 10:56 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Fri Mar 16, 11:08 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Nicholas Miell, (Fri Mar 16, 11:26 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 12:11 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, William Lee Irwin III, (Sat Mar 17, 12:25 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Nicholas Miell, (Sat Mar 17, 12:29 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, David Lang, (Sat Mar 17, 12:44 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 17, 12:45 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 17, 12:56 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Nicholas Miell, (Sat Mar 17, 1:23 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Serge Belyshev, (Sat Mar 17, 1:41 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 1:46 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Con Kolivas, (Sat Mar 17, 2:48 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 2:58 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 3:49 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, jos poortvliet, (Sat Mar 17, 4:07 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Gene Heskett, (Sat Mar 17, 4:48 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 17, 4:49 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Con Kolivas, (Sat Mar 17, 5:02 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Gene Heskett, (Sat Mar 17, 5:05 am)
Re: [ck] Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, jos poortvliet, (Sat Mar 17, 5:15 am)
Re: [ck] Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, jos poortvliet, (Sat Mar 17, 5:23 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 17, 5:28 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Con Kolivas, (Sat Mar 17, 5:43 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 17, 5:44 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 6:36 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, jos poortvliet, (Sat Mar 17, 6:44 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ed Tomlinson, (Sat Mar 17, 6:50 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ed Tomlinson, (Sat Mar 17, 6:56 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, michael chang, (Sat Mar 17, 6:58 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Ed Tomlinson, (Sat Mar 17, 7:04 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Mark Glines, (Sat Mar 17, 7:09 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Rik van Riel, (Sat Mar 17, 7:32 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 7:33 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 7:43 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Mark Glines, (Sat Mar 17, 7:54 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 7:58 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mark Hahn, (Sat Mar 17, 8:13 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 17, 8:39 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Al Boldi, (Sat Mar 17, 9:12 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 17, 9:34 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Gene Heskett, (Sat Mar 17, 10:03 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Stephen Clark, (Sat Mar 17, 10:22 am)
RE: [ck] Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, David Schwartz, (Sat Mar 17, 10:31 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 10:37 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Kacper Wysocki, (Sat Mar 17, 11:23 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 11:45 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Avi Kivity, (Sat Mar 17, 1:41 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Al Boldi, (Sat Mar 17, 1:55 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, William Lee Irwin III, (Sat Mar 17, 6:25 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Mar 17, 6:32 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Bill Davidsen, (Sat Mar 17, 7:13 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Kasper Sandberg, (Sat Mar 17, 8:20 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Bill Davidsen, (Sat Mar 17, 8:23 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Avi Kivity, (Sat Mar 17, 10:00 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Willy Tarreau, (Sat Mar 17, 10:24 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 10:37 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Avi Kivity, (Sat Mar 17, 10:55 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Bill Huey, (Sat Mar 17, 11:09 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 11:17 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 11:26 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Mar 17, 11:37 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Kasper Sandberg, (Sat Mar 17, 11:47 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Radoslaw Szkodzinski, (Sat Mar 17, 11:54 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Mar 18, 12:08 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Radoslaw Szkodzinski, (Sun Mar 18, 12:22 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Bill Huey, (Sun Mar 18, 12:35 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Mar 18, 12:38 am)
Re: [ck] Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Willy Tarreau, (Sun Mar 18, 12:58 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Mar 18, 1:04 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, jimmy bahuleyan, (Sun Mar 18, 1:20 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Mar 18, 1:34 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Kasper Sandberg, (Sun Mar 18, 2:57 am)
Re: [ck] Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, jos poortvliet, (Sun Mar 18, 3:58 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Avuton Olrich, (Sun Mar 18, 6:57 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Radoslaw Szkodzinski, (Sun Mar 18, 8:44 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, jos poortvliet, (Sun Mar 18, 9:09 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Lee Revell, (Sun Mar 18, 12:37 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Mar 18, 12:55 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Szonyi Calin, (Sun Mar 18, 3:45 pm)
RE: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, David Schwartz, (Sun Mar 18, 7:27 pm)
RE: RSDL v0.31, David Schwartz, (Sun Mar 18, 7:27 pm)
RE: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Mar 18, 11:21 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Willy Tarreau, (Sun Mar 18, 11:59 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Radoslaw Szkodzinski, (Mon Mar 19, 6:27 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Chris Friesen, (Mon Mar 19, 8:06 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Avi Kivity, (Mon Mar 19, 8:25 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mark Lord, (Mon Mar 19, 9:03 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Helge Hafting, (Mon Mar 19, 9:06 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mark Lord, (Mon Mar 19, 9:07 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Xavier Bestel, (Mon Mar 19, 9:26 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mark Lord, (Mon Mar 19, 9:36 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Avi Kivity, (Mon Mar 19, 9:37 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Xavier Bestel, (Mon Mar 19, 9:43 am)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, David Lang, (Mon Mar 19, 11:30 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Bill Davidsen, (Mon Mar 19, 1:47 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Al Boldi, (Mon Mar 19, 1:53 pm)
Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too?, Bill Davidsen, (Mon Mar 19, 2:14 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Mar 19, 8:11 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Willy Tarreau, (Mon Mar 19, 11:11 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Tue Mar 20, 1:03 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Xavier Bestel, (Tue Mar 20, 2:03 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, jos poortvliet, (Tue Mar 20, 3:19 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, jos poortvliet, (Tue Mar 20, 3:26 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Artur Skawina, (Tue Mar 20, 5:31 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mark Lord, (Tue Mar 20, 6:22 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ray Lee, (Tue Mar 20, 8:16 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mark Lord, (Tue Mar 20, 8:20 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Mar 20, 8:31 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Al Boldi, (Tue Mar 20, 11:08 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Artur Skawina, (Tue Mar 20, 12:16 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Artur Skawina, (Tue Mar 20, 12:50 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Al Boldi, (Tue Mar 20, 9:15 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Mar 21, 12:50 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Keith Duthie, (Wed Mar 21, 1:22 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Kasper Sandberg, (Wed Mar 21, 1:55 am)
Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31, Kasper Sandberg, (Wed Mar 21, 1:58 am)
RE: RSDL v0.31, David Schwartz, (Wed Mar 21, 3:43 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Wed Mar 21, 7:57 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Peter Zijlstra, (Wed Mar 21, 9:02 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Wed Mar 21, 10:06 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Artur Skawina, (Wed Mar 21, 10:24 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Thu Mar 22, 12:07 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 22, 2:18 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Thu Mar 22, 2:34 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Thu Mar 22, 2:41 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Con Kolivas, (Thu Mar 22, 3:03 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Con Kolivas, (Thu Mar 22, 3:50 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Thu Mar 22, 9:39 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Con Kolivas, (Thu Mar 22, 10:59 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Thu Mar 22, 11:11 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Mike Galbraith, (Fri Mar 23, 5:17 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Bill Davidsen, (Wed Mar 28, 4:37 pm)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Bill Davidsen, (Wed Mar 28, 4:43 pm)
RE: RSDL v0.31, David Schwartz, (Thu Mar 29, 12:10 am)
Re: RSDL v0.31, Nick Piggin, (Thu Mar 29, 12:34 am)