On Mar 15, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
quoted text > On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:19:03AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> ...
>> My initial question is that I don't want anyone using CONFIG_QE_83xx
>> or CONFIG_QE_85xx in code, the second part is if there is a way to
>> remove duplicating the QE_83xx/QE_85xx options down in platform/8
>> {3,5}
>> xx/Kconfig.
>
>
> What about the following solution:
>
>
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig.qe:
>
> <-- snip -->
>
> config MACH_SUPPORTS_QE
> bool
>
> config QE
> bool "QUICC Engine Support"
> depends on MACH_SUPPORTS_QE
> help
> ...
>
> <-- snip -->
>
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/Kconfig:
>
> <-- snip -->
>
> ...
> source arch/powerpc/Kconfig.qe
>
> config PPC_MPC836x
> bool
> select MACH_SUPPORTS_QE
> ...
> ....
>
> <-- snip -->
Not sure this helps since I end up having to source arch/powerpc/
Kconfig.qe from both arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/Kconfig & arch/
powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig and then mconf grips about having
already scanned Kconfig.qe.
- k
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: fake config option w/kbuild? , Kumar Gala , (Thu Mar 15, 1:08 pm)