Re: [patch 1/2] splice: dont steal

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Nick Piggin
Date: Thursday, March 15, 2007 - 5:45 am

On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 01:27:23PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:

Well considering that it is needed in order to solve 3 different deadlock
scenarios in the core write(2) path without taking a big performance hit,
I'd hope so ;)

It isn't guaranteed, but I have only had positive feedback so far. Would
take a while to actually get merged, though.

Nick
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 1/2] splice: dont steal, Nick Piggin, (Wed Mar 14, 5:14 am)
[patch 2/2] splice: dont readpage, Nick Piggin, (Wed Mar 14, 5:15 am)
Re: [patch 1/2] splice: dont steal, Jens Axboe, (Thu Mar 15, 4:52 am)
Re: [patch 2/2] splice: dont readpage, Jens Axboe, (Thu Mar 15, 4:54 am)
Re: [patch 1/2] splice: dont steal, Nick Piggin, (Thu Mar 15, 5:22 am)
Re: [patch 1/2] splice: dont steal, Jens Axboe, (Thu Mar 15, 5:27 am)
Re: [patch 2/2] splice: dont readpage, Nick Piggin, (Thu Mar 15, 5:27 am)
Re: [patch 2/2] splice: dont readpage, Jens Axboe, (Thu Mar 15, 5:38 am)
Re: [patch 1/2] splice: dont steal, Nick Piggin, (Thu Mar 15, 5:45 am)
Re: [patch 1/2] splice: dont steal, Jens Axboe, (Thu Mar 15, 5:54 am)
Re: [patch 1/2] splice: dont steal, Nick Piggin, (Thu Mar 15, 6:13 am)