> the x86_64 and i386 trees have diverged quite a bit though, so this will 
quoted text
> be a major logistical undertaking. And with Andi opposed to 
> fundamentally it it also lacks a bit of manpower i guess :-/

I'm not fundamentally opposed, just sceptical on the effort:gain ratio.

quoted text
> Andrew's laptop only half a dozen times! ;) But .. in the long run, it's 
> alot easier to think about unified code. 32-bit x86 will certainly stay 
> with us for at least 10-20 years, and the best model for maintainance is 
> having one codebase.

Not sure -- i'm often glad I don't have to care about all the old 32bit
systems on x86-64. I have no problem with modern 32bit x86 systems,
but old x86 tends to be very different from new x86. And all the old erratas
are scary.

-Andi
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/