> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 09:46:17PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 13:50 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>> This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
>>>
>>> If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
>>> of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
>>> of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
>>> possibly involved with one or more of these issues.
>>>
>>> Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering.
>>> Subject : Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -154983451 ns)
>>> References :
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/9/271
>>> Submitter : Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
>>> Status : unknown
>> That's not a regression. That's an informal message, when the TSC
>> watchdog detects that the TSC is unreliable.
>
> Looking at [1], there's also be a probably related "doesn't boot"
> problem.
> My first guess would be commit 6bb74df481223731af6c7e0ff3adb31f6442cfcd
> "clocksource init adjustments (fix bug #7426)".
>
> Jiri, is the message also present with 2.6.21-rc2 (at a different place
> of the dmesg) for you?
