From: Samuel Ortiz <samuel@sortiz.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 02:50:03 +0200

quoted text
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 04:49:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > I would strongly caution against adding any run-time overhead just to
> > cure a false lockdep warning.  Even adding a new function argument
> > is too much IMHO.
> > 
> > Make the cost show up for lockdep only, perhaps by putting each
> > hashbin lock into a seperate locking class?
> Does that look better to you:

Yes, it does.:)
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/