On Tuesday 13 March 2007 19:18, Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text
> * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> > [...] The situation as we speak is that you can run cpu intensive
> > tasks while watching eye-candy.  With RSDL, you can't, you feel the
> > non-interactive load instantly. [...]
>
> i have to agree with Mike that this is a material regression that cannot
> be talked around.
>
> Con, we want RSDL to /improve/ interactivity. Having new scheduler
> interactivity logic that behaves /worse/ in the presence of CPU hogs,
> which CPU hogs are even reniced to +5, than the current interactivity
> code, is i think a non-starter. Could you try to fix this, please? Good
> interactivity in the presence of CPU hogs (be them default nice level or
> nice +5) is _the_ most important scheduler interactivity metric.
> Anything else is really secondary.

Well I guess you must have missed where I asked him if he would be happy if I 
changed +5 metrics to do whatever he wanted and he refused to answer me. That 
would easily fit within that scheme. Any percentage of nice value he chose. I 
suggest 50% of nice 0. Heck I can even increase it if he likes. All I asked 
for was an answer as to whether that would satisfy his criterion.

quoted text
> 	Ingo
>
> ps. please be nice to each other - both of you are long-time
>     scheduler contributors who did lots of cool stuff :-)

I have been civil. Only one email crossed the line on my part and I apologise.

-- 
-ck
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/