* Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:

quoted text
> > It's not "offensive" to me, it is a behavioral regression.  The 
> > situation as we speak is that you can run cpu intensive tasks while 
> > watching eye-candy.  With RSDL, you can't, you feel the 
> > non-interactive load instantly.  Doesn't the fact that you're asking 
> > me to lower my expectations tell you that I just might have a point?
> 
> Yet looking at the mainline scheduler code, nice 5 tasks are also 
> supposed to get 75% cpu compared to nice 0 tasks, however I cannot 
> seem to get 75% cpu with a fully cpu bound task in the presence of an 
> interactive task. [...]

i'm sorry, but your argument seems to be negated. We of course have no 
problem with interactive tasks stealing CPU time from CPU hogs. The 
situation Mike found is _the other direction_: that /CPU hogs/ stole 
from interactive tasks. That's bad and needs to be fixed. Please?

	Ingo
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/