New thread RDSL, post-2.6.20 kernels and amanda (tar) miss-fires

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Gene Heskett
Date: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 - 1:28 am

Greetings;
Someone suggested a fresh thread for this.

I now have my scripts more or less under control, and I can report that 
kernel-2.6.20.1 with no other patches does not exhibit the undesirable 
behaviour where tar thinks its all new, even when told to do a level 2 on 
a directory tree that hasn't been touched in months to update anything.

Next up, 2.6.20.2, plain and with the latest RDSL-0.30 patch.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
[..]

No I didnt.  Someone else wrote that.  Please keep attributions
straight.
	-- From linux-kernel
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
New thread RDSL, post-2.6.20 kernels and amanda (tar) miss ..., Gene Heskett, (Tue Mar 13, 1:28 am)
Re: New thread RDSL, post-2.6.20 kernels and amanda (tar) ..., William Lee Irwin III, (Tue Mar 13, 10:07 pm)
Re: New thread RDSL, post-2.6.20 kernels and amanda (tar) ..., William Lee Irwin III, (Tue Mar 13, 10:44 pm)
Re: New thread RDSL, post-2.6.20 kernels and amanda (tar) ..., William Lee Irwin III, (Tue Mar 13, 11:19 pm)