On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 16:53 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
quoted text
> On Tuesday 13 March 2007 16:10, Mike Galbraith wrote:

quoted text
> > It's not "offensive" to me, it is a behavioral regression.  The
> > situation as we speak is that you can run cpu intensive tasks while
> > watching eye-candy.  With RSDL, you can't, you feel the non-interactive
> > load instantly.  Doesn't the fact that you're asking me to lower my
> > expectations tell you that I just might have a point?
> 
> Yet looking at the mainline scheduler code, nice 5 tasks are also supposed to 
> get 75% cpu compared to nice 0 tasks, however I cannot seem to get 75% cpu 
> with a fully cpu bound task in the presence of an interactive task.

(One more comment before I go.  You can then have the last word this
time, promise :)

Because the interactivity logic, which was put there to do precisely
this, is doing it's job?

quoted text
>  To me 
> that means mainline is not living up to my expectations. What you're saying 
> is your expectations are based on a false cpu expectation from nice 5. You 
> can spin it both ways.

Talk about spin, you turn an example of the current scheduler working
properly into a negative attribute, and attempt to discredit me with it.

The floor is yours.  No reply will be forthcoming.

	-Mike

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/